Supporting Consultation Documents

Object

Representation ID: 24300

Received: 22/11/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Issues raised previously haven't been addressed. The SA represents an optimistic view. For example it assumes 15% modal shift from cars to more sustainable transport. The impact on the town centre of the Council's focus on delivering the sugar beet site should be assessed. It does not assess the potential impacts of the garden suburb development halting midway. Not surprised by conclusions that there are no changes to significant effects or mitigation.

Support

Representation ID: 24301

Received: 22/11/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

The SA quite rightly highlights the lack of information and uncertainty in assess the effects on traffic, air quality and climate change of circa 4,000 homes identified in the Core Strategy to be built in association with neighbouring local authorities and exposes a hole in the Core Strategy which needs to be rectified at this review.