Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report

Comment

Representation ID: 25339

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Environment Agency

The Water Framework directive (WFD) is mentioned, but not thoroughly considered. The WFD objectives and local RBMP actions should be used to inform the Local Plan making process. The LPA should consider the priorities in the RBMP when developing strategic plans to help deliver WFD objectives. The SA should detail where WFD requirements will have to be met and what actions/mitigation measures
will be required to deliver them.

Comment

Representation ID: 25340

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Environment Agency

Paragraph 5.3 incorrectly states that we are responsible for main rivers and flood defences. We have permissive powers, and riparian owners also have responsibilities. Paragraph 5.64 omits the fluvial flood risk in Ipswich. Paragraph 5.66 only defines the flood zones fluvially. Paragraph 5.67 - We will be undertaking revised flood modelling of the River Gipping next year, and we will have revised coastal modelling for the River Orwell by the end of this year. These models can be used to update the SFRA if required. Paragraph 5.69 should explain how most development types are prevented from being located in Flood Zone 3b by table 3 of the Planning Practice Guidance. Table 27 key Issues could include the possible future surface water management projects led by SCC and incorporating the findings into future development plans for the town. The text refers to Shoreline Management Policies, many of which are to reduce flood risk, however it is not clear why it is separated from the flooding section. Table 28 with the Key Issues for the Coast and Estuaries does not mention flood risk.