Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review

Search representations

Results for Ipswich & East Suffolk Clinical Commissioning Group & West Suffolk CCG search

New search New search

Object

Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review

CS10

Representation ID: 26135

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Ipswich & East Suffolk Clinical Commissioning Group & West Suffolk CCG

Representation Summary:

NHS England are not dispensing new primary care contracts currently so the opportunities of establishing a new health centre in the Ipswich Garden Suburb are severely reduced. Mitigation for the increase in patients from the proposed Ipswich Garden Suburb will be spread between Two Rivers Medical Practice and the new healthcare facility at Tooks.

NHS England are not dispensing new primary care contracts currently so the opportunities of establishing a new health centre in the Ipswich Garden Suburb are severely reduced. The impact of the development and increase in patients will be mitigated by options currently being explored.

Full text:

See Scanned Representation.

Object

Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review

Delivering Development at the Borough boundary

Representation ID: 26136

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Ipswich & East Suffolk Clinical Commissioning Group & West Suffolk CCG

Representation Summary:

The possibility of issues arising from developments near to local authority boundaries with regards to healthcare provision is prevalent in the LP. The developments of Ipswich Suburb, continued development of Ravenswood and Whitton are examples of these possible cross boundary developments. Communication and cooperation will be vital in making sure that all appropriate stakeholders are aware of developments and mitigation can be sought in a timely manner. Cooperation will be required between the CCG, IBC, SCDC and BMSDC to make sure that the land North of Ipswich in both local plans is accounted for in mitigating health.

Full text:

See Scanned Representation.

Object

Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review

The Objectives

Representation ID: 26137

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Ipswich & East Suffolk Clinical Commissioning Group & West Suffolk CCG

Representation Summary:

Objective 9 - While we recognise that neighbourhood planning would ideally like to promote community facilities located in or within 800m of a centre this is not always possible with primary care provision. The CCG would not be able to endorse the objective and would look at expanding current surgeries or co-locating surgeries to mitigate against projected patient numbers. Options are currently being looked at for the larger proposed developments as to how to provide primary healthcare.

Objective 12 - Welcome opportunity to work closely with ISPA officers to allow a more holistic view of strategic planning going forward.

Full text:

See Scanned Representation.

Object

Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review

CS12

Representation ID: 26141

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Ipswich & East Suffolk Clinical Commissioning Group & West Suffolk CCG

Representation Summary:

Ipswich & East Suffolk CCG would like to raise the importance of creating essential NHS worker housing in the LP to help reduce workforce shortages in the locality.

The provision of assisted living developments and residential care homes, although a necessary feature of care provision and to be welcomed, can pose significant impacts on local primary care provision and it is important that planners and developers engage at a very early stage with the NHS, to plan and implement suitable mitigations.

Full text:

See scanned representation.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.