Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
Search representations
Results for Kesgrave Covenant Ltd search
New searchObject
Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
Chapter 7 - The Key Diagram
Representation ID: 25562
Received: 21/02/2019
Respondent: Kesgrave Covenant Ltd
In summary, we support the inclusion of land within our client's control at Humber Doucy lane for inclusion within the Core Strategy. As set out in the attached more detailed representation, this is a sustainably located and deliverable site on the edge of Ipswich. the Key Diagram shows this site as a 'broad location' and we submit that it should be an allocation in accordance with policy SCLP12.24 of the Suffolk Coastal Final Draft Local Plan. The Ipswich draft Core Strategy should also provide increased flexibility to enable the site to come forward prior to 2031.
See attached scanned representation.
Support
Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
Scale and location of growth
Representation ID: 25563
Received: 21/02/2019
Respondent: Kesgrave Covenant Ltd
We generally support this policy in terms of the identified targets and commitment to joint working. As detailed in the attached submission, land within our client's control falls within both Ipswich Borough's boundary and Suffolk Coastal District and through a master planned approach can deliver an extension to the built up area of Ipswich.
See attached scanned representation.
Object
Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
Delivering Development at the Borough boundary
Representation ID: 25564
Received: 21/02/2019
Respondent: Kesgrave Covenant Ltd
We support the inclusion of land within our client's control at Humber Doucy Lane on the northern edge of Ipswich, however it is submitted that these sites should be an allocation rather than a broad location. this would accord with the approach taken by Suffolk Coastal District Council in their draft policy SCLP12.24 of the Suffolk Coastal Final Draft Local Plan. Furthermore, we submit that the plan should provide increased flexibility to come forward before 2031. Further details in relation to this site are set out int the attached representation.
See attached scanned representation.
Object
Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
CS2
Representation ID: 25565
Received: 21/02/2019
Respondent: Kesgrave Covenant Ltd
We partially support this policy as it is currently drafted. We support the inclusion of land within our client's control at the northern end of Humber Doucy Lane. Please also see objection comment on this policy.
See attached scanned representation.
Object
Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
CS2
Representation ID: 25566
Received: 21/02/2019
Respondent: Kesgrave Covenant Ltd
We partially object to this policy as it is currently drafted. We support the inclusion of land within our client's control at the northern end of Humber Doucy Lane, however we submit that this land should be an allocation rather than a broad location and the plan should be worded to provide flexibility for the site to come forward earlier in the Plan period. This objection should be considered int he context of the Council's inability to meet their housing requirements int he early years of the Plan period (as set out in our response to Policy CS7).
See attached scanned representation.