Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review

Search representations

Results for Kesgrave Covenant Ltd search

New search New search

Object

Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review

Chapter 7 - The Key Diagram

Representation ID: 25562

Received: 21/02/2019

Respondent: Kesgrave Covenant Ltd

Representation Summary:

In summary, we support the inclusion of land within our client's control at Humber Doucy lane for inclusion within the Core Strategy. As set out in the attached more detailed representation, this is a sustainably located and deliverable site on the edge of Ipswich. the Key Diagram shows this site as a 'broad location' and we submit that it should be an allocation in accordance with policy SCLP12.24 of the Suffolk Coastal Final Draft Local Plan. The Ipswich draft Core Strategy should also provide increased flexibility to enable the site to come forward prior to 2031.

Full text:

See attached scanned representation.

Support

Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review

Scale and location of growth

Representation ID: 25563

Received: 21/02/2019

Respondent: Kesgrave Covenant Ltd

Representation Summary:

We generally support this policy in terms of the identified targets and commitment to joint working. As detailed in the attached submission, land within our client's control falls within both Ipswich Borough's boundary and Suffolk Coastal District and through a master planned approach can deliver an extension to the built up area of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached scanned representation.

Object

Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review

Delivering Development at the Borough boundary

Representation ID: 25564

Received: 21/02/2019

Respondent: Kesgrave Covenant Ltd

Representation Summary:

We support the inclusion of land within our client's control at Humber Doucy Lane on the northern edge of Ipswich, however it is submitted that these sites should be an allocation rather than a broad location. this would accord with the approach taken by Suffolk Coastal District Council in their draft policy SCLP12.24 of the Suffolk Coastal Final Draft Local Plan. Furthermore, we submit that the plan should provide increased flexibility to come forward before 2031. Further details in relation to this site are set out int the attached representation.

Full text:

See attached scanned representation.

Object

Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review

CS2

Representation ID: 25565

Received: 21/02/2019

Respondent: Kesgrave Covenant Ltd

Representation Summary:

We partially support this policy as it is currently drafted. We support the inclusion of land within our client's control at the northern end of Humber Doucy Lane. Please also see objection comment on this policy.

Full text:

See attached scanned representation.

Object

Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review

CS2

Representation ID: 25566

Received: 21/02/2019

Respondent: Kesgrave Covenant Ltd

Representation Summary:

We partially object to this policy as it is currently drafted. We support the inclusion of land within our client's control at the northern end of Humber Doucy Lane, however we submit that this land should be an allocation rather than a broad location and the plan should be worded to provide flexibility for the site to come forward earlier in the Plan period. This objection should be considered int he context of the Council's inability to meet their housing requirements int he early years of the Plan period (as set out in our response to Policy CS7).

Full text:

See attached scanned representation.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.