Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
Search representations
Results for Save Our Country Spaces search
New searchObject
Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
Delivering Development at the Borough boundary
Representation ID: 25876
Received: 13/03/2019
Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces
Ipswich has not taken SCDC Neighbourhood Plans nor Parish Council submissions into account.
The plan does nothing to address the long standing deficit in Open Space in North and East Ipswich.
The public notices are in wrong locations.
The area is a green corridor and development would be in breach of CS16.
Development will adversely impact on the sensitivity of the Fynn Valley and needs to address light pollution and heritage.
Need to protect post-brexit "best and most versatile" Grade 2 farm land.
Will lead to coalescence of Westerfield, Tuddenham and Ipswich.
See Northern Fringe Comments.
See Scanned Representation.
Object
Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
Chapter 1 - Introduction
Representation ID: 26140
Received: 13/03/2019
Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces
Suggest the Final Draft Local Plan fails the tests of soundness as it is not positively prepared, not justified, not effective and not consistent with national policy.
The Climate Change agenda (NPPF10) is insufficiently addressed and proposals are contrary to this.
The HRA and SA have inadequately and inaccurately assessed the effects of the plan.
Serious adverse effects, as required under NPPF 6 - 17, have not been properly identified.
NPPF-11 has not been adequately taken into account.
See scanned representation.
