ipswich.gov.uk
Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft
Search representations
Results for Historic England search
New searchObject
Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft
Site Ref: ISPA 4.1 (Policy SP2 & ISPA4) Northern End of Humber Doucy Lane
Representation ID: 26659
Received: 02/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Site includes Grade II Listed Everton School Westerfield House, and adjacent to/within the setting of other Grade II Listed buildings (Allens House, and Laceys Farmhouse). Development must preserve and where possible enhance these assets and their settings where this setting contributes to significance. Heritage Impact Assessment required, which must assess the contribution this land makes to those elements which contribute towards the significance of the heritage assets (designated and non-designated), and determine what impact its development might have upon their significance. Any specific measures required to remove/ mitigate any harm should be included in a site specific policy for ISPA4.1.
Heritage Impact Assessment required and any mitigation required subsequently included in a site specific policy for this site.
Object
Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft
Policy SP11 – The Waterfront
Representation ID: 26663
Received: 02/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Unclear which boundaries are the Opportunity areas and which areas are covered by Policies SP11, SP12, and SP13. Opportunity areas need to be clearly defined and labelled. Chapter 6 of the Site Allocation document provides further information on the opportunity areas, setting out development principles for each area, which we welcome. However, these principles are not set out in policies SP11, SP12, and SP13, and it would appear that the other opportunity areas in this section of the Plan (see our comments regarding the mismatch of opportunity areas above) don’t have policies at all.
The opportunity areas need to be clearly defined and labelled on the IP-One policies map. request that you review the wording for these policies again; identifying which heritage assets (or their settings) would be affected by the proposed development. Where a potential impact is identified, wording should be included in the policy and supporting text to this effect. This wording should incorporate the design principles set out in Chapter 6 of the Plan, and should include/draw on/reference, where relevant the Archaeological Character Zone by Archaeological Character Zone recommendations set out in Appendix 3 of the Council’s Development & Archaeology supplementary planning document (SPD) (November 2018), as well as the Council’s Urban Character SPD.
Object
Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft
Policy SP12 – Education Quarter
Representation ID: 26664
Received: 02/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Unclear which boundaries are the Opportunity areas and which areas are covered by Policies SP11, SP12, and SP13. Opportunity areas need to be clearly defined and labelled. Chapter 6 of the Site Allocation document provides further information on the opportunity areas, setting out development principles for each area, which we welcome. However, these principles are not set out in policies SP11, SP12, and SP13, and it would appear that the other opportunity areas in this section of the Plan (see our comments regarding the mismatch of opportunity areas above) don’t have policies at all.
The opportunity areas need to be clearly defined and labelled on the IP-One policies map. request that you review the wording for these policies again; identifying which heritage assets (or their settings) would be affected by the proposed development. Where a potential impact is identified, wording should be included in the policy and supporting text to this effect. This wording should incorporate the design principles set out in Chapter 6 of the Plan, and should include/draw on/reference, where relevant the Archaeological Character Zone by Archaeological Character Zone recommendations set out in Appendix 3 of the Council’s Development & Archaeology supplementary planning document (SPD) (November 2018), as well as the Council’s Urban Character SPD.
Object
Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft
Policy SP13 – Portman Quarter (formerly Ipswich Village)
Representation ID: 26665
Received: 02/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Unclear which boundaries are the Opportunity areas and which areas are covered by Policies SP11, SP12, and SP13. Opportunity areas need to be clearly defined and labelled. Chapter 6 of the Site Allocation document provides further information on the opportunity areas, setting out development principles for each area, which we welcome. However, these principles are not set out in policies SP11, SP12, and SP13, and it would appear that the other opportunity areas in this section of the Plan (see our comments regarding the mismatch of opportunity areas above) don’t have policies at all.
The opportunity areas need to be clearly defined and labelled on the IP-One policies map. request that you review the wording for these policies again; identifying which heritage assets (or their settings) would be affected by the proposed development. Where a potential impact is identified, wording should be included in the policy and supporting text to this effect. This wording should incorporate the design principles set out in Chapter 6 of the Plan, and should include/draw on/reference, where relevant the Archaeological Character Zone by Archaeological Character Zone recommendations set out in Appendix 3 of the Council’s Development & Archaeology supplementary planning document (SPD) (November 2018), as well as the Council’s Urban Character SPD.
