Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Search representations
Results for ARTISAN PPS LTD search
New searchObject
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Policy DM36 Employment areas
Representation ID: 208
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Agent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Corindale properties Ltd. object to the allocation of its land in Toller Road exclusively for employment purposes and consider that such an allocation is unduly restrictive, ignores the market and the experience of that market over the last 10 years and in future prospect. At the very least, an element of other uses such as limited retail and residential should be incorporated either into the policy or the allocation for the land be changed to that of a mixed use reflecting what is needed to deliver sites in the foreseeable future thereby contributing towards the regeneration of Ipswich.
Corindale properties Ltd. object to the allocation of its land in Toller Road exclusively for employment purposes and consider that such an allegation is on Julie restrictive, ignores the market and the experience of that market over the last 10 years and in future prospect. At the very least, an element of other uses such as limited retail and residential should be incorporated either into the policy for the allocation for the land be changed to that of a mixed use reflecting what is needed to deliver sites in the foreseeable future thereby contributing towards the regeneration of Ipswich.
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Policy DM39 Land allocated for housing
Representation ID: 217
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Agent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
There is a need for greater flexibility either within the specific wording of DM39 to facilitate interim alternative uses until the viability/returns of residential development fit within a site owners own business needs.
RCP Parking Ltd. object to the way in which their site which they own in Handford Road East (IP 096), is referred to in this policy. Whilst they support the allocation of the land in principle for residential purposes, the decision of when to develop/dispose should be part of their commercial strategy rather than a third party. The company has not been consulted on its business plans.
RCP Parking Ltd. object to the way in which their site which they own in Handford Road East (IP 096), is referred to in this policy. Whilst they support the allocation of the land in principle for residential purposes, the decision of when to develop/dispose should be part of their commercial strategy rather than a third party. The draft allocation indicates that it has a short-term delivery timescale but the company has not been consulted on its own business plans. Had it been so consulted it would have reaffirmed the need for flexibility and the certainty of interim beneficial uses such as car parking in a difficult economic climate.
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Policy DM40 Land with planning permission or awaiting a Section 106
Representation ID: 220
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Agent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Beeson Properties Ltd. consider that alternative uses for the site are possible whilst not objecting to the allocation proposed. However, as part of a retail led regeneration of this part of the waterfront, this site with its prominent gateway position to this part of the town could accommodate a special, architecturally imposing development with a high component of retail floor space. It is acknowledged that it can only achieve this in conjunction with the allocation of other sites for similar purposes in line with the representations made by Applekirk Properties Ltd. or independently.
Beeson Properties Ltd. consider that alternative uses for the site are possible whilst not objecting to the allocation proposed. However, as part of a retail led regeneration of this part of the waterfront, this site with its prominent gateway position to this part of the town could accommodate a special, architecturally imposing development with a high component of retail floor space. It is acknowledged that it can only achieve this in conjunction with the allocation of other sites for similar purposes in line with the representations made by Applekirk Properties Ltd. or independently.
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Policy DM42 Land allocated for employment use
Representation ID: 225
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Agent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Applekirk Properties Ltd object to the allocation of their site (IP035) as an employment site. This ignores the multi-use mixed scheme for which the site already has planning permission as well as the pivotal/enabling role that this site could perform in a retail led regeneration of this end of the Ipswich waterfront.
Applekirk Properties Ltd object to the allocation of their site (IP035) as an employment site. This ignores the multi-use mixed scheme for which the site already has planning permission as well as the pivotal/enabling role that this site could perform in a retail led regeneration of this end of the Ipswich waterfront.
Support
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Policy DM51 Town Centre Boundary
Representation ID: 226
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Agent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Applekirk Properties Ltd and Beeson properties Ltd support the designated, extended town centre boundary and the inclusion of sites IP035 and IP132 within it.
Applekirk Properties Ltd and Beeson properties Ltd support the designated, extended town centre boundary and the inclusion of sites IP035 and IP132 within it.
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Policy DM57 Town Centre Parking
Representation ID: 227
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Agent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Both Beeson Properties Ltd and RCP Parking object to the delineation of the central parking core as shown on the proposals map and consider that it should be changed and extended to include a number of sites which are making a very effective contribution towards parking provision for the people of Ipswich and will do so and can do so for the foreseeable future.
Both Beeson Properties Ltd and RCP Parking object to the delineation of the central parking core as shown on the proposals map and consider that it should be changed and extended to include a number of sites which are making a very effective contribution towards parking provision for the people of Ipswich and will do so and can do so for the foreseeable future.
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Policy DM47 Central Shopping Area
Representation ID: 229
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Agent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Applekirk Properties Ltd consider that the proposed, designated central shopping area should be extended to include the area in and around the northern end of the waterfront at the end of St Peter Street including its own site at IP035.
Applekirk Properties Ltd consider that the proposed, designated central shopping area should be extended to include the area in and around the northern end of the waterfront at the end of St Peter Street including its own site at IP035.
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Policy DM49 Retail Site Allocation
Representation ID: 231
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Agent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Applekirk Properties Ltd consider that site IP 040 and 041 now combined as site 040 as the focus of further major retail development is the wrong location with which to deliver the council's retail aspirations, turns its back on the needs of the stalled waterfront regeneration but more so the opportunity that the waterfront area presents. Moreover the allocation of the site simply serves to perpetuate the east-west alignment of the central area for retail purposes in which the extremities of that area has failed for that purpose for many years. This allocation perpetuates the prospect of continuing retail failure.
Applekirk Properties Ltd consider that site IP 040 and 041 now combined as site 040 as the focus of further major retail development is the wrong location with which to deliver the council's retail aspirations, turns its back on the needs of the stalled waterfront regeneration but more so the opportunity that the waterfront area presents. Moreover the allocation of the site simply serves to perpetuate the east-west alignment of the central area for retail purposes in which the extremities of that area has failed for that purpose for many years. This allocation perpetuates the prospect of continuing retail failure.
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Policy DM52 The Waterfront
Representation ID: 233
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Agent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
As is consistent with other objections to the focused review of the core strategy and to this DPD submitted by Applekirk Properties Ltd, the company considers that the land use policies for the waterfront (as proposed) are inadequate for the waterfront's regeneration needs. In particular the policy needs more flexibility and to recognise that interim uses can make a contribution. Acceptable land uses in planning terms for this area need to include retail for it to stand any chance rekindling its regeneration.
as is consistent with other objections to the focused review of the core strategy and to this DPD submitted by Applekirk Properties Ltd. The company considers that the land use policies for the waterfront (as proposed) are inadequate for the waterfront's regeneration needs. In particular the policy needs more flexibility and to recognise that interim uses can make a contribution. Acceptable land uses in planning terms for this area need to include retail for it to stand any chance rekindling its regeneration.
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Policy DM57 Town Centre Parking
Representation ID: 235
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Agent: ARTISAN PPS LTD
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
RCP Parking Ltd considers that the whole approach to the control of parking in the central area is hopelessly aspirational and undeliverable and ignores the very real contribution that sites such as those that they operate at Burrell Road, Duke Street/Orwell Quay, Handford Road, lower Orwell Street, Princes Street, Ranelagh Road, Rose Lane, St Peter's warehouse Bridge Street make to the people working, shopping and undertaking leisure in Ipswich. There is no detail as to the viability/deliverability of these proposed multi-storey car parks a number of which have been aspirational intentions in previous Local Plans. None have been delivered.
RCP Parking Ltd considers that the whole approach to the control of parking in the central area is hopelessly aspirational and undeliverable and ignores the very real contribution that sites such as those that they operate at Burrell Road, Duke Street/Orwell Quay, Handford Road, lower Orwell Street, Princes Street, Ranelagh Road, Rose Lane, St Peter's warehouse Bridge Street make to the people working, shopping and undertaking leisure in Ipswich. There is no detail as to the viability/deliverability of these proposed multi-storey car parks a number of which have been aspirational intentions in previous Local Plans. None have been delivered.
