Site Allocations and Policies (Incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document (DPD) Main Modifications
Search representations
Results for Suffolk County Council search
New searchObject
Site Allocations and Policies (Incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document (DPD) Main Modifications
MM307 - Page N/A, New Policy
Representation ID: 26794
Received: 23/09/2021
Respondent: Suffolk County Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
IP048a-d:The New Policy for the Mint Quarter includes does not include the early years setting associated with the primary school, which is recognised in Table 8a, is not included in the policy. For completeness the policy should be amended to state: “Mint Quarter/Cox Lane East Regeneration Area facing Carr Street (IP048d): 0.43ha for a primary school and early years provision”.
Amend the policy to state: “Mint Quarter/Cox Lane East Regeneration Area facing Carr Street (IP048d): 0.43ha for a primary school and early years provision."
See scanned representation.
Object
Site Allocations and Policies (Incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document (DPD) Main Modifications
MM279 - Page N/A, New Policy
Representation ID: 26795
Received: 23/09/2021
Respondent: Suffolk County Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
IP003: In part ‘b’ of this policy, it is recommended that the word “retention” is replaced with the word “safeguarding”. This would make the language of the policy more in line with chapter 17 of the NPPF and the Suffolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan.
Replace "retention" with "safeguarding" in part b.
See scanned representation.
Object
Site Allocations and Policies (Incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document (DPD) Main Modifications
MM281 - Page N/A, New Policy
Representation ID: 26796
Received: 23/09/2021
Respondent: Suffolk County Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
IP004: While the current wording does highlight the relationship it does not explain the significance of being near a safeguarded site, or what may be expected of developers and decision makers because of it. For consistency and clarity it is recommended that the wording in other policies near to safeguarded minerals and waste sites is used (see suggested change). While the safeguarded sites near to IP004 are part of IP003, and will require relocation when IP003 is redeveloped, safeguarding will still be a material consideration in planning decisions while the waste and concrete batching site are operational.
For consistency and clarity it is recommended that part i of this policy is replaced by: “The site allocation is within 250m of a safeguarded waste use site and concrete batching plant in the SMWLP. It should be demonstrated that the development of the site allocation does not prevent the minerals and waste facilities from operating as normal, and that the users of the proposed development are not adversely impacted by the presence of the nearby facilities."
See scanned representation.
Object
Site Allocations and Policies (Incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document (DPD) Main Modifications
MM268 - Page N/A, New Policy
Representation ID: 26797
Received: 23/09/2021
Respondent: Suffolk County Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
IP080: The policy acknowledges there is a relationship with a safeguarded minerals site. However, while this does highlight the relationship it does not explain the significance of being near a safeguarded site, or what may be expected of developers and decision makers because of it. For consistency and clarity it is recommended that the wording in other policies near to safeguarded minerals and waste sites is used for IP080 (see suggested change).
IP120b & IP279: These site allocation policies do not recognise two safeguarded minerals and waste sites within 250 meters. These policies should contain the new text accordingly (see suggested change). While the safeguarded sites near to these allocated sites are part of IP003, and will require relocation when IP003 is redeveloped, safeguarding will still be a material consideration in planning decisions while the waste and concrete batching site are operational.
IP080: Amend existing policy wording regarding SMWLP to state: “The site allocation is within 250m of a safeguarded railhead and wharves in the SMWLP. It should be demonstrated that the development of the site allocation does not prevent the mineral and waste facilities from operating as normal, and that the users of the proposed development are not adversely impacted by the presence of the nearby waste facilities."
IP120b & IP279: Insert the following text into each policy: "The site allocation is within 250m of a safeguarded waste use site and concrete batching plant in the SMWLP. It should be demonstrated that the development of the site allocation does not prevent the minerals and waste facilities from operating as normal, and that the users of the proposed development are not adversely impacted by the presence of the nearby facilities."
See scanned representation.
Object
Site Allocations and Policies (Incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document (DPD) Main Modifications
MM299 - Page N/A, New Policy
Representation ID: 26798
Received: 23/09/2021
Respondent: Suffolk County Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
IP119: This site allocation policy does not recognise two safeguarded minerals and waste sites within 250 metres. It should contain new text (see suggested change). While the safeguarded sites near to the allocated site are part of IP003, and will require relocation when IP003 is redeveloped, safeguarding will still be a material consideration in planning decisions while the waste and concrete batching site are operational.
Insert new text into policy IP119: “The site allocation is within 250m of a safeguarded waste use site and concrete batching plant in the SMWLP. It should be demonstrated that the development of the site allocation does not prevent the minerals and waste facilities from operating as normal, and that the users of the proposed development are not adversely impacted by the presence of the nearby facilities.”
See scanned representation.
Object
Site Allocations and Policies (Incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document (DPD) Main Modifications
MM270 - Page N/A, New Policy
Representation ID: 26799
Received: 23/09/2021
Respondent: Suffolk County Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
IP279: This site allocation policy does not recognise two safeguarded minerals and waste sites within 250 meters. The policies should contain additional text (see suggested change). While the safeguarded sites near to this allocated site are part of IP003, and will require relocation when IP003 is redeveloped, safeguarding will still be a material consideration in planning decisions while the waste and concrete batching site are operational.
IP279: include the following additional text: "The site allocation is within 250m of a safeguarded waste use site and concrete batching plant in the SMWLP. It should be demonstrated that the development of the site allocation does not prevent the minerals and waste facilities from operating as normal, and that the users of the proposed development are not adversely impacted by the presence of the nearby facilities."
See scanned representation.
Support
Site Allocations and Policies (Incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document (DPD) Main Modifications
MM262 - Page 61, Policy SP16
Representation ID: 26800
Received: 23/09/2021
Respondent: Suffolk County Council
Modifications to this policy are supported.
See scanned representation.
Support
Site Allocations and Policies (Incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document (DPD) Main Modifications
MM263 - Page 63, Policy SP17
Representation ID: 26801
Received: 23/09/2021
Respondent: Suffolk County Council
Modifications to this policy are in line with what is agreed in statements of common ground between the Borough and County Councils and is and is supported.
See scanned representation.
Object
Site Allocations and Policies (Incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document (DPD) Main Modifications
MM196 - Page N/A, New Policy
Representation ID: 26802
Received: 23/09/2021
Respondent: Suffolk County Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
SCC supports this policy, but suggests there could be some improvements. Reference to adopted cycling and walking infrastructure strategies of both the councils could be mentioned in the policy, not just the explanatory text, and projects contributing to the Transport Mitigation Strategy for ISPA. The second paragraph could also make reference to improving the quality of PRoW themselves, as well as linkages to them (see suggested change).
Amend the second paragraph of this policy to read as follows: "The Council will seek opportunities to deliver specific sustainable travel infrastructure improvements outside the IP-One Area through safeguarding sites/routes where necessary, new developments and/or seeking funding opportunities. In particular opportunities will be sought to deliver routes that implement the Ipswich Cycling Strategy, Suffolk County Council Walking and Cycling Infrastructure Plan and The Transport Mitigation Strategy for the Ipswich Strategic Planning Area.
Throughout the Borough, development should improve linkages to and quality of the public rights of way network, including cross boundary links, where opportunities exist to do so."
See scanned representation.
