ipswich.gov.uk
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Search representations
Results for Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners search
New searchObject
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
DM25
Representation ID: 573
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The policy is unclear: the word 'or' should be inserted after (b) , or (a) and (b) should be combined. The new text at 9.140 also potentially conflicts with criteria at (a) and (b) and should be deleted. The approach to employment sites should be considered in realation to the need for other uses. The evidence base shows more retail and leisure is required and it is requested the Jewson site is allocated to help meet the need. Policy DM25 as written risks prejudicing the supply of retail/town centre floorpsace in suitable locations.
see attached
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
CS14
Representation ID: 574
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
There is insufficent evidence to justify the proposed reduction in new retail floorspace in policy CS14 up to 2026; the figures are not based on an up to date assessment. The DTZ 2013 suggests the Council should review/update the 2010 Strategic Retail Capacity Study to assess future requirements.
see attached
