Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Search representations

Results for Lafarge Tarmac search

New search New search

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

9.30

Representation ID: 645

Received: 07/03/2014

Respondent: Lafarge Tarmac

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Measures to ensure that new development is flood resilient are supported. It must be recognised, however, that the re-use and expansion of existing industrial sites located within the flood plain (including the Ipswich port) should not be unnecessarily fettered by flood restrictions where simple measures such as flood evacuation plans can allow industrial activity to safely take place.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

DM25

Representation ID: 646

Received: 07/03/2014

Respondent: Lafarge Tarmac

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

This policy should explicitly acknowledge the important role of Ipswich Port and the need for flexibility to support both port related activities and established industrial uses within the port site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

DM26

Representation ID: 653

Received: 07/03/2014

Respondent: Lafarge Tarmac

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The sub-text to this policy at paragraph 9.146 is very important and is of particular importance in assessing the Council's proposals for regeneration. In planning for more sensitive uses (e.g. housing), these should be located away from industrial sites to prevent future objections which may prevent the effective operation of the existing use and thus be harmful to the economy.

Full text:

See attached.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.