Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Search representations
Results for Planning Potential Limited search
New searchObject
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
CS13
Representation ID: 186
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Planning Potential Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Council should acknowledge para. 21 of the NPPF and in particular bullet point 3, which states 'Policies should be flexible enough to accommodate needs not anticipated in the plan and to allow a rapid response to changes in economic circumstances.' The Consequence of this is that sites perhaps not envisaged at the plan making stage can suddenly become available whilst existing facilities may need to rapidly adapt at short notice. If planning policy is not sufficiently flexible, this can lead to unnecessary inertia, restricting development delivery and job creation.
See attached letter
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
DM23
Representation ID: 187
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Planning Potential Limited
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The 200sqm threshold is too restrictive, especially in respect of the potential requirement for an impact assessment. The NPPF sets a default threshold of 2,500sqm, which is considered to better reflect retail proposals that would potentially require investigation of impact.
The 200sqm threshold is too restrictive, especially in respect of the potential requirement for an impact assessment. The NPPF sets a default threshold of 2,500sqm, which is considered to better reflect retail proposals that would potentially require investigation of impact