ipswich.gov.uk

I oppose further gypsy traveller sites being agreed in our area.
It does unfortunately look as if councils are blinded by meeting government targets for gypsy traveller sites and simply focus less and less on the importance of our rural villages and its needs.
Why choose a site so close to the West Meadows site??? The other gypsy traveller site based in Henniker Road is also only a stone's throw away from our village.
Ipswich town surely has one or two areas which can be reviewed. Around a mile away West Meadows gypsy traveller site already has 41 agreed pitches. They are based right next to the busy A14 with the high volumes of traffic and noise levels and increasing pollution.
I am concerned about the security of my property and effects on our community.
I feel this plan is untenable and has been turned down in the past. Any further work on this proposal is a direct waste of tax payer's money.
With all the councils resources I'm confident other possible sites can be reviewed.
A concern would be if the River Hill site was to be granted and issues arose with nearby residents or businesses which affected community cohesion.
This is 'forward thinking' which is a good thing and more of it should be done reference this proposal.
I have reviewed the IBC core strategy vision and improving the quality of life for all who live in and around Bramford / Ipswich is exactly what should be achieved. This is of paramount importance.
I agree with another part of the vision and hope that the council ensure amenities such as Clarice House and Lumberjacks can always be enjoyed by local residents as well as visitors. Ensuring all local businesses continue and are not affected in any way.