ipswich.gov.uk
Object
Post Submission Main Modifications Core Strategy and Policies (DPD) and Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) (DPD)
Representation ID: 24369
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group
Number of people: 100
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
There is no evidence that that IGS housing can be delivered within the required timeframe as there is still no solution to key infrastructure issues including traffic, drainage and foul water. SCC has objected to the Crest planning application for IGS and the earlier CBRE application. The CS needs to recognise that the IGS might not be fully delivered in the required timescale. This change is required due to the implications of the removal of the infrastructure delivery triggers from the CS. Table 3 is unsound: it is unclear and needs correcting. Alternative wording is suggested for CS7 clause B).
See attached.