Object
Preferred Options Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review
Representation ID: 25721
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: AquiGen
Representation Summary:
Consider that site 1 (appendix 1) should be removed because:
- Futura Park has had extensive marketing since early/ mid 2012.
- There has been no interest in the frontage plot for B Class uses consistent with the 2011 permission.
- It has attracted no interest despite being serviced and benefiting from a permission.
- The New Anglia Enterprise Zone in 2016 has not led to new interest.
- The plot has a different townscape character to the remaining parts of Futura park;
- Could accommodate other non B class uses;
- Interest in sites 6 and 7
Full text:
See Scanned Representation.