Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5324
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Crest Strategic Projects
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
We fully support the continued allocation of the IGS (CS10). However, there is no evidence available to demonstrate how the triggers included within supporting Table 8B have been arrived at, and whether they represent an "appropriate stage" for delivery. CS10 and Table 8B do not have due regard to the need for a "comprehensive approach" to the development of IGS as a whole. There are currently no effective mechanisms in place to ensure the delivery of infrastructure or to ensure a collaborative approach to development, which will compromise the deliverability of IGS as a whole.
See attached.