ipswich.gov.uk

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5324

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Crest Strategic Projects

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

We fully support the continued allocation of the IGS (CS10). However, there is no evidence available to demonstrate how the triggers included within supporting Table 8B have been arrived at, and whether they represent an "appropriate stage" for delivery. CS10 and Table 8B do not have due regard to the need for a "comprehensive approach" to the development of IGS as a whole. There are currently no effective mechanisms in place to ensure the delivery of infrastructure or to ensure a collaborative approach to development, which will compromise the deliverability of IGS as a whole.

Full text:

See attached.