Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5417
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Arwel Owen
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The requirement for at least 35% affordable housing provision in the IGS is not justified by the evidence, nor does it contribute to an effective policy. This level of affordable housing provision is not viable in Ipswich. The NPPF makes it clear (paragraphs 173-177) that local plan policy should not place an undue burden on development and that the implications of policy should be tested during plan making. The PBA Viability Testing for the Ipswich Development Plan provides no scenario which models the IGS. On a practical level, a floorspace measure is incapable of being applied to outline planning applications.
See attached.