ipswich.gov.uk

CS13

Showing comments and forms 1 to 30 of 696

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 186

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Planning Potential Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Council should acknowledge para. 21 of the NPPF and in particular bullet point 3, which states 'Policies should be flexible enough to accommodate needs not anticipated in the plan and to allow a rapid response to changes in economic circumstances.' The Consequence of this is that sites perhaps not envisaged at the plan making stage can suddenly become available whilst existing facilities may need to rapidly adapt at short notice. If planning policy is not sufficiently flexible, this can lead to unnecessary inertia, restricting development delivery and job creation.

Full text:

See attached letter

Comment

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 189

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Westerfield Parish Council

Representation Summary:

There is no evidence to support the job growth forecasts given in CS13. Given there has been no growth in the last 5 years, a forecast growth of 17% over the plan period seems optimistic.
Westerfield Parish Council request that growth forecast for the different employment sectors are re-instated into Policy CS13 of the Core Strategy.

Full text:

There is no evidence to support the job growth forecasts given in CS13. Given there has been no growth in the last 5 years, a forecast growth of 17% over the plan period seems optimistic. It has been noted that the job growth forecast in different employment sectors, contained in the adopted Core Strategy, have been removed. More evidence base, in line with NPPF guidelines, is needed to support the figure. Details should also include part time employment, which could have an effect on the total number of dwellings required. Westerfield Parish Council request that growth forecast for the different employment sectors are re-instated into Policy CS13 of the Core Strategy.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 501

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: AquiGen

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

In Policy CS13d the site has effectively been delivered under Outline planning permission 11/00763 which remians live unitl 22.12.2015. As the policy objective has been fulfilled the site specific allocation is no longer needed and it is recommended Policy CS13d and Para 8.150 and 8.152 are deleted; as they are not justified or necessary this threatens the Soundness of the Plan. In the absence of any application non-B class uses can be assessed against Policy DM25.

Full text:

see attached

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 507

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: AquiGen

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Para 8.146 and Policy DM25 seek to restrict uses on Employment Sites to those in the B Class. It is suggested this is infexible and there should be recognition of the role of all forms of economic development in employment creation. Wider uses can include retail and town centre uses, but also Sui Generis, in particular car showrooms. It is recommended that Policy DM25 is amended to include reference to 'Economic Development' rather than B Class uses; if not acceptable there should be reference to acceptable non B class uses and it is recommended car showroom is included.

Full text:

see attached

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 622

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Babergh District Council & Midsuffolk District Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

BDC/MSDC would reiterate its concern over the abandonment of existing paragraph 3.3/making the plan "housing led" and whether the approach fits the wider role of Ipswich regards providing employment for a wider area.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 642

Received: 07/03/2014

Respondent: Lafarge Tarmac

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

In line with the additional commentary suggested earlier, this policy should also recognise the role of supporting jobs in Ipswich Port by providing the conditions to enable expansion and re-use of land without the imposition of unnecessary restrictions or prohibitive standards.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 742

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Ian and Helen MacNaughton

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Where is the policy for growing jobs in Ipswich and regenerating the town centre? Otherwise the residents of proposed new homes will have to look outside Ipswich for work which is not of any sustainable benefit to Ipswich. Job creation of between 5,500 (a conservative estimate assuming one worker per property) and 21,000 have to be found for these proposals to have any chance of success and avoid the future problem of a decaying and under-populated development on the Northern Fringe and elsewhere in Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 820

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Save our Country Spaces has major concerns about the changes to policy CS13 and supports the Northern Fringe Protection Group's detailed analysis and comments.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 890

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The policy is based on current economic forecasts and will need to be updated to reflect the economic strategy for the borough and the wider area. Priority should be afforded to employment generating development (principally offices but also leisure uses) in and around the town centre but particularly between the railway station and the town centre to reinforce this connection. Whilst the priority could not apply between different sites, it could express the attention that the council will afford to this area.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 895

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr David Parker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 916

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr John D Jordan

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 923

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Janet Johnson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 930

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Mary Ames

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 937

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Alexander McDonald

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 944

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Rowell Bell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 951

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Bernard Jasper

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 958

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Nigel Grant

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 965

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr D E Heckels

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 972

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Graham H Mitchell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 979

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr C Watson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 986

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Leslie Palmer

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 993

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Michael Pert

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 1000

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Jaimie Greig

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 1007

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Peter Stonebridge

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 1014

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Derek Rose

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 1021

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr I Coleman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 1028

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Stephen Traynor

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 1035

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Miss Hannah Devine

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 1042

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Susan Arbuthnot

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 1049

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr T Humphries

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A firm and realistic job target is required 2011-2031 and this needs to be in balance with the housing target.

Full text:

See attached.