Support

Representation ID: 356

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: The Ipswich Society

Another prime site which has been badly used over the years, nothing can be added to the stated development principles

Object

Representation ID: 439

Received: 14/03/2014

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

References to heritage issues are largely missing from this area, even though it contains a listed building and is near to others (e.g. the Willis Building) and the Central conservation area. The boundary of the area is also unclear, as the development principles refer to improved frontages and public realm on the street adjacent to St Nicholas Church, but the map shows the church some way outside the opportunity area. There may be archaeology issues also, with the area of archaeological importance covering part of the opportunity area.

Object

Representation ID: 576

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Objection to omission of Site UC029 from site allocation on the 'development options' map. The site will be available for redevelopment in the plan period which the owners wish to promote. It is considered that the Council is failing to allocate a suitable site to meet the scale and type of retail and leisure development needed in the town centre. Development would address poor environmental quality in the area and heal the fragmented townscape between the town centre and Cardinal Park.