Object

Representation ID: 5185

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The emerging consensus from NALEP, SCC, UCS and the owner of the port is for employment use. IBC has been involved in these discussions.

Support

Representation ID: 5229

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Historic England

The Island Site forms a large part of the Wet Dock Conservation Area and contributes to the significance of this heritage asset. We welcome the wording in the development constraints regarding the retention and refurbishment of historic structures and the reference to archaeology including industrial heritage. The wording also helpfully refers to the principles contained within Opportunity Area A (which we broadly support).

Object

Representation ID: 5304

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: New Anglia LEP for Norfolk and Suffolk

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Allocation IP037 needs to recognise the mineral handling facilities at the Port, which are protected through the Minerals Plan and DM26 and are part of the delivery of a wider marine plan.