ipswich.gov.uk
IP133 - South of Felaw Street
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 5126
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Dr William Millar
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Given the number of identified brown field sites in the consultation document, the development of 33 houses on this site is an unnecessary conversation of a green space into a built environment. This is the only area of green land available to children in the area and is used by adults and children for recreational purposes. There is a high density of housing around the space, with a young population and no other available recreational area nearby, within walking distance available to children. The council should reconsider the allocation of any building on this land.
Given the number of identified brown field sites in the consultation document, the development of 33 houses on this site is an unnecessary conversation of a green space into a built environment. This is the only area of green land available to children in the area and is used by adults and children for recreational purposes. There is a high density of housing around the space, with a young population and no other available recreational area nearby,within walking distance available to children. The council should reconsider the allocation of any building on this land.
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 5127
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr oliver ingwall king
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Given the number of identified brown field sites in the consultation document, the development of 33 houses on this site is an unnecessary conversation of a green space into a built environment. This is the only area of green land available to children in the area and is used by adults and children for recreational purposes. There is a high density of housing around the space, with a young population and no other available recreational area nearby,within walking distance available to children. The council should reconsider the allocation of any building on this land
Given the number of identified brown field sites in the consultation document, the development of 33 houses on this site is an unnecessary conversation of a green space into a built environment. This is the only area of green land available to children in the area and is used by adults and children for recreational purposes. There is a high density of housing around the space, with a young population and no other available recreational area nearby,within walking distance available to children. The council should reconsider the allocation of any building on this land
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 5248
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Historic England
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
We note this site is now proposed for allocation following the lapse of planning permission. The site adjoins the Wet Dock Conservation Area and the Grade II listed building of 42-48 Felaw Street, and is within the area of archaeological importance. While the development constrains refer to the area of archaeological importance, there is no reference to the conservation area or listed building, or what the implications are for development. The lack of clarity could affect proposals for this site, notwithstanding the reference to the development principles set out in Opportunity Area A.
We note this site is now proposed for allocation following the lapse of planning permission. The site adjoins the Wet Dock Conservation Area and the Grade II listed building of 42-48 Felaw Street, and is within the area of archaeological importance. While the development constrains refer to the area of archaeological importance, there is no reference to the conservation area or listed building, or what the implications are for development. The lack of clarity could affect proposals for this site, notwithstanding the reference to the development principles set out in Opportunity Area A.
As currently drafted, we consider the plan to be unsound as the site sheet is not effective or consistent with national policy. Paragraph 157 of the NPPF requires Local Plans to provide adequate detail with site allocations (fifth bullet), with the Planning Practice Guidance providing further emphasis (PPG Reference ID: 12-010-20140306 (last revised 06/03/2014). Conservation of the historic environment is a core planning principle (Paragraph 17) and Local Plans should set out a positive strategy in this respect (Paragraph 126).
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 5305
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: New Anglia LEP for Norfolk and Suffolk
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Allocation IP133 needs to recognise the mineral handling facilities at the Port, which are protected through the Minerals Plan and DM26 and are part of the delivery of a wider marine plan.
See attached.