Object

Representation ID: 21651

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr D H Powell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21659

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs D R Powell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21667

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Alan King

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21675

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Wendy King

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21683

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Brian Holland

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21691

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Holland

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21699

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Janet King

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21707

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr John King

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21715

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Simon and Debbie Chalklen

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21723

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Simon and Debbie Chalklen

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21731

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr M D McCarthy

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21739

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Ms A M Embley

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21747

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Dr D Pledger

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21755

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs E Pledger

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21763

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Roy Kitson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21771

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Nora Kitson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21787

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Terry Mullett

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21795

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Pack

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21803

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Kenneth Pack

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21811

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Laurence C K Yew

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21819

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr R A Jacobs

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21827

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs W Jacobs

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21835

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr R L Wicks

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21843

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr R L K Whittell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21851

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr John F Butler

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21859

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Anne F Butler

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21867

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Day

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21875

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Rodney Shanks

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21883

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Dawn Shanks

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 21891

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Lee Taylor

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.