Object

Representation ID: 24048

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Davina E Farrow

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 24057

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Linda Quantrill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 24085

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr L Linnell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 24090

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr K Walker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 24091

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Slyvia D Carthew

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 24105

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Richard and Elizabeth Howse

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 24121

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Richard N Cater

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 24127

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr John Howarth

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 24130

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Frederick Farrow

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 24136

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Mavis Hammond

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 24149

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Derek Hayward

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 24166

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Janet Hayward

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 24174

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Adrian Smith

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 24182

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr B Garraway

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 24190

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr David Brett

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 24214

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: EDF Energy Plc

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

There should be a preference for development on brownfield land. There should be some flexibility with density standards. In certain situations outside of the town centre it may be possible to achieve higher densities and each site should be assessed on a site specific basis.