Object

Representation ID: 22651

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Lynne Morley

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 22659

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Neil Morley

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 22667

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Harry Downes

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 22675

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Downes

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 22683

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr R M Alexander

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 22691

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs J W Alexander

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 22699

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Adrian Morphew Pauline Turpin

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 22707

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Adrian Morphew Pauline Turpin

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23309

Received: 02/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs B A Coulter

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23321

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr David Cole-Jones

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23334

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Ms Elspeth MacFadyen

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23347

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Tom Cheen

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23360

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Miss Sarah Jennings

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23373

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Brian Morris

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23386

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Roger Holt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23399

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Gillian Holt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23438

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs J Cole-Jones

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23451

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs T B Strutt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23464

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs T B Strutt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23477

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Barry Tooke

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23490

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Lesley Tooke

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23503

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Derek Ford

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23516

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Ipswich Wildlife Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23529

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Miss Hannah Lawes

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23542

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Lee Lawes

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23555

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Cindy Lawes

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23568

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Jane Tywndale-Biscoe

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23581

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Robert Ian Bullock

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23594

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Bridget Bullock

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 23607

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Richard Partridge

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.