Object

Representation ID: 18643

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Denise Calver

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18651

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr D King

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18659

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs R King

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18667

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Robert Minter

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18675

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Jean Minter

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18683

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs S M Coppin

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18699

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs G Beales

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18707

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Ian R Beales

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18715

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Ian M Beales

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18723

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs K and M Oliver

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18731

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs K and M Oliver

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18739

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Ms Ann Waters

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18747

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Kathleen Waters

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18755

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Wyle White

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18763

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Marjory White

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18771

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Alonso Paez-Ramirez

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18779

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Susan Paez

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18787

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Miss Rebecca Paez

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18795

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Robert Hebden

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18803

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Kate Hebden

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18819

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr John Ames

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18827

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr David Reeve

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18835

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Janice Reeve

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18843

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr David Kilham

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18851

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Aideen Carter

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18859

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr R C Sadler

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18867

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr E T P De Lagroux

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18875

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Raymond T Leonard

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18883

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Wendy A Leonard

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 18891

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr A M Buckingham

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.