CS17: Delivering Infrastructure
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23096
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Neil Bateman
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23114
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Anna Brennan
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23138
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs J Evans
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23149
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Paul Robinson
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23160
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Yvonne Bruce
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23171
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Ashley Watson
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23182
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Richard Attenborrow
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools, access to GPs and social care services will cope. Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23193
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: J Mehmed
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23204
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Claire Thorneloe
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23215
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Kathryn Hatcher
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23226
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Owen Funtham
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23237
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Mark Funtham
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23248
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Barry Smith
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23259
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: B Burley
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23270
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: A Exworth-Cook
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23281
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: R F Gladwell
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23303
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr I Evans
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23316
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr David Cole-Jones
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23329
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Ms Elspeth MacFadyen
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23342
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Tom Cheen
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23355
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Sarah Jennings
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23368
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Brian Morris
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23381
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Roger Holt
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23394
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Gillian Holt
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23407
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Colin Bennett
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23420
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Chelsea Bennett
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23433
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs J Cole-Jones
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23446
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs T B Strutt
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23459
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs T B Strutt
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23472
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Barry Tooke
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.