Object

Representation ID: 24198

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Mavis Hammond

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 24207

Received: 20/07/2015

Respondent: Susan Wallace-Shaddad

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.

Object

Representation ID: 24217

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: EDF Energy Plc

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Financial contributions should be sought in areas where there is an identified deficiency and at a level which ensures that the overall delivery of appropriate development is not compromised. Government guidance states that planning obligations must be fair, reasonable and proportionate.