ipswich.gov.uk

CS20: Key Transport Proposals

Showing comments and forms 901 to 930 of 1053

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22518

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Barry Laws

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22526

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Jane Laws

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22534

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr M J Jackson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22542

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs R A Jackson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22550

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Robert and Gillian Ellis

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22558

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Peter Edwards

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22566

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Emma Blaylock

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22574

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Ricky Blaylock

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22582

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr B Murray

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22590

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Mandy Green

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22598

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Terence Marsh

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22606

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Jacqueline Marsh

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22614

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr R Paul

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22622

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Paul

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22630

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sue Humphrys

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22638

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Bryn Humphrys

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22646

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Lynne Morley

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22654

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Neil Morley

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22662

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Harry Downes

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22670

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Downes

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22678

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr R M Alexander

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22686

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs J W Alexander

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22694

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Adrian Morphew Pauline Turpin

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22702

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Adrian Morphew Pauline Turpin

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22710

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Andrew Isles

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22737

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Richard and Elizabeth Howse

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22755

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Slyvia D Carthew

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22762

Received: 02/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs B A Coulter

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22765

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: The Occupier

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 22774

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Michael Hurrell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Full text:

See attached.