Object

Representation ID: 23080

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: N/A Cracknell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23089

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Neil Bateman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23107

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Anna Brennan

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23139

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs J Evans

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23150

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Paul Robinson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23161

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Yvonne Bruce

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23172

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Ashley Watson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23183

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Richard Attenborrow

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23194

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: J Mehmed

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23205

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Claire Thorneloe

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23216

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Kathryn Hatcher

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23227

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Owen Funtham

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23238

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Mark Funtham

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23249

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Barry Smith

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23260

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: B Burley

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23271

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: A Exworth-Cook

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23282

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: R F Gladwell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23304

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr I Evans

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 23319

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr David Cole-Jones

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 23332

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Ms Elspeth MacFadyen

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 23345

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Tom Cheen

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 23358

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Miss Sarah Jennings

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 23371

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Brian Morris

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 23384

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Roger Holt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 23397

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Gillian Holt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 23410

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Colin Bennett

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 23423

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Miss Chelsea Bennett

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 23436

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs J Cole-Jones

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 23449

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs T B Strutt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 23462

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs T B Strutt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. As such the plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.