ipswich.gov.uk

Question 12:

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 24964

Received: 25/10/2017

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Representation Summary:

Yes. A more realistic growth scenario based on the Government's White paper target and the Experian jobs target; although we note even this is double the historic trend.
A scenario that takes account of BREXIT, including weaker sterling levels, should be assessed. We note that paragraph 5.38 of the SHMA states that a 10 year scenario was ruled out because of the low levels of international migration following the recession. However, this type of scenario is far more likely given BREXIT and the much weaker pound, which have slashed the attractiveness of the UK to EU workers.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 25063

Received: 31/10/2017

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Representation Summary:

Yes, a scenario that takes account of BREXIT, including weaker sterling levels, should be assessed. We note that paragraph 5.38 of the SHMA states that a 10 year scenario was ruled out because of the low levels of international migration following the recession. However, this type of scenario is far more likely given BREXIT and the much weaker pound, which have slashed the attractiveness of the UK to EU workers. Growth should go where it is sustainable. The Local Plan growth agenda is unsustainable. A clear and unequivocal determination of wider infrastructure needs, and funding to meet them, is needed.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 25506

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Sue Catt

Representation Summary:

Do we need to infill every spare bit of land with housing? No. There are so many empty buildings and half built things in Ipswich and these should be looked at first.

Full text:

See attached.