Question 45:
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 25179
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Environment Agency
When allocating additional permanent pitches for Gypsies and Travellers, we support the existing policy CS11, which requires under b.iii. for the site to be 'free from flood risk'. Caravans, mobile homes and park homes intended for permanent residential use are classed as 'highly vulnerable' so are not permitted in Flood Zone 3, require the exception test in Flood Zone 2, and are very difficult to make safe through raised flood levels. Therefore, we consider that this requirement for Gypsy and Traveller sites to be free from flood risk should be maintained in any new policy.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 25249
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Ipswich Community Media CIC
Gypsies and Travellers should be protected and not discriminated against.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 25304
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
Location is always going to be difficult; but we should insist on more smaller sites rather than larger sites such as West Meadows. Evidence suggests larger sites can cause more problems the larger they get.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 25467
Received: 31/10/2017
Respondent: Ipswich Community Media CIC
Well, we are fairly disgusted that the west meadows site will be terminated. Lets face it - it is a fairly bleak site anyway - under pylons - who else would want it - at least it was somewhere - it is a contentious subject at best - why not support it to have better infrastructure and services?
See attached.