ipswich.gov.uk

Site Ref: IP011c (Policy SP2) Smart Street/ Foundation Street (North)

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26599

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Ipswich School

Agent: Mr Matt Clarke

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Site IP011c: Allocated in 1997 Local Plan as part of site ref: 5.8, yet has not to date come forward for development. It is suggested that a more cautious approach is taken to the likelihood of delivery being achieved within the Plan Period.

Change suggested by respondent:

Not specified

Attachments:

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26609

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Amend for clarity: ‘The site lies… close to the grade II* St Mary at Quay Church, (delete: contains two scheduled monuments) and lies within an area of archaeological importance.’ Also amend: ‘There is also limited potential for nationally important archaeological remains outside of the (insert: scheduled and previously scheduled) areas. (Delete: This is because much of the site has already been excavated in the past. Detailed early) Pre-application discussion with Suffolk County Council Archaeological Service (add: is advised.) (Delete: and Historic England would be required to agree the scope of required assessment, the principle of development and to inform design.’)

Change suggested by respondent:

Amend for clarity: ‘The site lies… close to the grade II* St Mary at Quay Church, (delete: contains two scheduled monuments) and lies within an area of archaeological importance.’ Also amend: ‘There is also limited potential for nationally important archaeological remains outside of the (insert: scheduled and previously scheduled) areas. (Delete: This is because much of the site has already been excavated in the past. Detailed early) Pre-application discussion with Suffolk County Council Archaeological Service (add: is advised.) (Delete: and Historic England would be required to agree the scope of required assessment, the principle of development and to inform design.’)

Attachments: