ipswich.gov.uk
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Search representations
Results for Lawson Planning Partnership Ltd search
New searchObject
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
CS17: Delivering Infrastructure
Representation ID: 5120
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: Lawson Planning Partnership Ltd
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
NHS England (NHSE) wishes to re-state the objection raised at the previous consultation stage in respect to this policy. Specifically, NHSE objects to the limitation imposed by the policy on securing the direct provision of infrastructure by developers.
The policy, as currently worded, would preclude the direct provision of infrastructure by developers, as it allows for mitigation to take the form of a commuted sum or CIL payment only.
By introducing a restriction in the way the impacts of development could be mitigated, the policy cannot be considered 'positively prepared', 'justified', 'effective' or 'consistent with national planning policy'.
NHS England (NHSE) wishes to re-state the objection raised at the previous consultation stage in respect to this policy. Specifically, NHSE objects to the limitation imposed by the policy on securing the direct provision of infrastructure by developers.
The policy, as currently worded, would preclude the direct provision of infrastructure by developers, as it allows for mitigation to take the form of a commuted sum or CIL payment only.
By introducing a restriction in the way the impacts of development could be mitigated, the policy cannot be considered 'positively prepared', 'justified', 'effective' or 'consistent with national planning policy'.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
10: Table 8B
Representation ID: 5121
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: Lawson Planning Partnership Ltd
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
NHS England (NHSE) objects to the inclusion of the health centre required to serve the proposed Garden Suburb as an infrastructure item to serve the southern neighbourhood only.
The requirement for a new health centre is based on the overall growth to be accommodated within the Garden Suburb and, therefore, should be included as an item of strategic infrastructure.
The omission of the health centre from the list of strategic infrastructure to serve the Garden Suburb is not 'positively prepared', 'justified', 'effective' or 'consistent with national planning policy' and, therefore cannot be considered 'sound'.
NHS England (NHSE) objects to the inclusion of the health centre required to serve the proposed Garden Suburb as an infrastructure item to serve the southern neighbourhood only.
The requirement for a new health centre is based on the overall growth to be accommodated within the Garden Suburb and, therefore, should be included as an item of strategic infrastructure.
The omission of the health centre from the list of strategic infrastructure to serve the Garden Suburb is not 'positively prepared', 'justified', 'effective' or 'consistent with national planning policy' and, therefore cannot be considered 'sound'.
