ipswich.gov.uk

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Search representations

Results for Northern Fringe Protection Group search

New search New search

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Objective 3

Representation ID: 5473

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Number of people: 323

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

ONS migration data used by the Council only extends to 2010/11, the latest ONS forecast shows no net migration from 2012-2031 for Ipswich. DCLG's February 2015 household projections suggest a need for 10,434 new homes. The baseline household figure used is too high. The Viability Report indicates 28% affordable housing for the Garden Suburb, the affordable housing target should not compromise delivery of other infrastructure. It is not clear whether the jobs target relates to Ipswich or the Ipswich Policy Area. How will jobs growth be measured? A higher population has been used to estimate jobs growth than population growth.

Full text:

See attachment

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Objective 6

Representation ID: 5474

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Number of people: 323

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The CS relies heavily on a transport modal shift from cars to more sustainable modes such as walking, cycling and public transport. This will be challenging and it is suggested that an additional indicator of the Census travel mode to work data be included to improve soundness.

Full text:

See attachment

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Objective 12

Representation ID: 5475

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Number of people: 323

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The proposed indicator is vague and gives no measure of beneficial outcomes from working together on jobs growth, housing growth or strategic infrastructure.

Full text:

See attachment

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

DM10 - Protection of Trees and Hedgerows

Representation ID: 5510

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Number of people: 323

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

In order to be sustainable Policy DM10 needs to reference the Hedgerow Regulations 1997 and the CS needs to state that "important hedgerows" will be protected from being removed (uprooted or destroyed).

Full text:

See attachment

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.