Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Search representations
Results for Ipswich Central search
New searchSupport
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
SP15 Improving Pedestrian and Cycle Routes
Representation ID: 5452
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Central
We also support improved pedestrian routes and vistas from the town centre to/from the Waterfront. Equally, we do not think that the traffic on Star Lane should be thought of as preventing this.
We also support improved pedestrian routes and vistas from the town centre to/from the Waterfront. Equally, we do not think that the traffic on Star Lane should be thought of as preventing this.
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
IP040 and IP041 - Civic Centre Area / Civic Drive
Representation ID: 5453
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Central
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Site IP040 and IP041 - this site should not be allocated for retail, but for primarily residential development.
Site IP040 and IP041 - this site should not be allocated for retail, but for primarily residential development.
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
IP048 - Mint Quarter / Cox Lane
Representation ID: 5454
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Central
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Site IP048 - the area of this site that sits closest to Upper Brook Street should be allocated for a modern 'big-box' retail cluster. We envisage something like an out-of-town retail development with parking, built on this in-town site.
Site IP048 - the area of this site that sits closest to Upper Brook Street should be allocated for a modern 'big-box' retail cluster. We envisage something like an out-of-town retail development with parking, built on this in-town site.
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
SP15 Improving Pedestrian and Cycle Routes
Representation ID: 5455
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Central
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Upper Brook Street (P46) and Museum Street - we would like to see both streets pedestrianised and high-quality residential development returned to Museum Street south. The latter appears to be omitted.
Upper Brook Street (P46) and Museum Street - we would like to see both streets pedestrianised and high-quality residential development returned to Museum Street south. The latter appears to be omitted.
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
5.4
Representation ID: 5456
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Central
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Section 5.4 (P38) - whilst the document states that the plan is consistent with the Masterplan and Vision, there are substantial and important elements that are not consistent. The emphasis towards a north-south progression (section 5.5 P38) is not consistent with the planned retail development on the Westgate area.
Section 5.4 (P38) - whilst the document states that the plan is consistent with the Masterplan and Vision, there are substantial and important elements that are not consistent. The emphasis towards a north-south progression (section 5.5 P38) is not consistent with the planned retail development on the Westgate area.
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
5.13
Representation ID: 5460
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Central
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Section 5.13 (Page 40) - we disagree strongly that this is the only site available for retail development. Greater emphasis should also be placed upon finding alternative uses for uneconomic and underused retail units in secondary locations - primarily Carr Street (east) and Westgate Street (west) - and improvement to provision between Tower Ramparts/Cornhill southwards.
Section 5.13 (P40) - we disagree strongly that this is the only site available for retail development. Greater emphasis should also be placed upon finding alternative uses for uneconomic and underused retail units in secondary locations - primarily Carr Street (east) and Westgate Street (west) - and improvement to provision between Tower Ramparts/Cornhill southwards.
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
SP14 Arts, Culture and Tourism
Representation ID: 5461
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Central
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Policy SP14 (P44) - the support that the Council shows for a conference/exhibition space is welcomed, but substantially more detail is required for what exactly is planned here and how it could be achieved. There has been talk of a new 'attraction' and, again, this needs consideration.
Policy SP14 (P44) - the support that the Council shows for a conference/exhibition space is welcomed, but substantially more detail is required for what exactly is planned here and how it could be achieved. There has been talk of a new 'attraction' and, again, this needs consideration.
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
SP17 Town Centre Car Parking
Representation ID: 5463
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Central
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Car Parking (SP17) - Ipswich must be made more appealing to the car-borne visitor, not less. Plans to rebuild Crown Street car park are to be welcomed. The new car park must include good quality spaces and a much improved link across Crown Street.
Car Parking (SP17) - Ipswich must be made more appealing to the car-borne visitor, not less. Plans to rebuild Crown Street car park are to be welcomed. The new car park must include good quality spaces and a much improved link across Crown Street.
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
5.52
Representation ID: 5464
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Central
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Car Parking (section 5.52 P50) - we are not convinced that Travel Ipswich has "encouraged mode switching" in the way described or aspired to. It may, instead, have simply reduced visitors which is to the detriment of the town. We are extremely concerned about the way in which this section appears to indicate continuing with an anti-car direction.
Car Parking (section 5.52 P50) - we are not convinced that Travel Ipswich has "encouraged mode switching" in the way described or aspired to. It may, instead, have simply reduced visitors which is to the detriment of the town. We are extremely concerned about the way in which this section appears to indicate continuing with an anti-car direction.
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Opportunity Area A - Island Site
Representation ID: 5465
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Central
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Island Site (P56) - we are encouraged by the 'Enterprise Island' plans, particularly if an integrated transport improvement is included. The plans most recently revealed go further than the Development Plan suggests.
Island Site (P56) - we are encouraged by the 'Enterprise Island' plans, particularly if an integrated transport improvement is included. The plans most recently revealed go further than the Development Plan suggests.
