Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Search representations
Results for Ipswich Central search
New searchSupport
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Opportunity Area B - Merchant Quarter
Representation ID: 5466
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Central
Merchant Quarter (P62) - we are broadly supportive of a mixed residential, retail and restaurant/café development. Car parking should be included, if possible.
Merchant Quarter (P62) - we are broadly supportive of a mixed residential, retail and restaurant/café development. Car parking should be included, if possible.
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Opportunity Area C - Mint Quarter / Cox Lane regeneration area and surrounding area
Representation ID: 5467
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Central
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Mint Quarter (P64) - the name should be dropped as it is associated with failure. In addition to the proposals, we consider this site could be used for the 'big-box retail cluster' outlined above. There may also be potential for it to be used as a single bus station, although the site currently occupied by Jewsons may offer this potential also.
Mint Quarter (P64) - the name should be dropped as it is associated with failure. In addition to the proposals, we consider this site could be used for the 'big-box retail cluster' outlined above. There may also be potential for it to be used as a single bus station, although the site currently occupied by Jewsons may offer this potential also.
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Opportunity Area F - River and Princes Street Corridor
Representation ID: 5468
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Central
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
River and Princes Street Corridor (P74) - we have previously resisted comprehensive retail development on part of this site. We continue to do so and are pleased that this has been dropped in the new plan. We consider there to be potential on the waterfront element for residential development. We fully support new office development in Princes Street.
River and Princes Street Corridor (P74) - we have previously resisted comprehensive retail development on part of this site. We continue to do so and are pleased that this has been dropped in the new plan. We consider there to be potential on the waterfront element for residential development. We fully support new office development in Princes Street.
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
7.3
Representation ID: 5469
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Central
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Section 7.3 (P78) - we are disappointed and extremely surprised that neither Ipswich Central nor the Greater Ipswich Partnership are viewed as 'key partnerships' in helping to deliver any plans for the town centre or beyond.
Section 7.3 (P78) - we are disappointed and extremely surprised that neither Ipswich Central nor the Greater Ipswich Partnership are viewed as 'key partnerships' in helping to deliver any plans for the town centre or beyond.
