ipswich.gov.uk
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Suffolk Preservation Society search
New searchComment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 2:
Representation ID: 24694
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society
A high quality historic environment rich in designated and non-designated heritage assets including listed buildings, conservation areas and parks and gardens. The Borough abuts the Suffolk Coasts and Heaths Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, a nationally designated landscape, and impacts of development on the setting of which should be accorded full weight in the development plan.
A high quality historic environment rich in designated and non-designated heritage assets including listed buildings, conservation areas and parks and gardens. The Borough abuts the Suffolk Coasts and Heaths Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, a nationally designated landscape, and impacts of development on the setting of which should be accorded full weight in the development plan.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 3:
Representation ID: 24695
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society
A number of brownfield sites along Star Lane and Grafton Way which interrupt the connectivity between the historic core of the town and the Waterfront. Environmental improvements to these important streets would facilitate the regeneration of the town.
A number of brownfield sites along Star Lane and Grafton Way which interrupt the connectivity between the historic core of the town and the Waterfront. Environmental improvements to these important streets would facilitate the regeneration of the town.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 4:
Representation ID: 24696
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society
Focus on the historic environment as a key driver for regeneration of the town's economy
Focus on the historic environment as a key driver for regeneration of the town's economy
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 6:
Representation ID: 24697
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society
SPS believes that the Baseline, Scenario A should be planned for. We believe that to aim for greater economic growth would require a substantial increase in the level of housing that would be undeliverable given the identified constraints on available housing land.
SPS believes that the Baseline, Scenario A should be planned for. We believe that to aim for greater economic growth would require a substantial increase in the level of housing that would be undeliverable given the identified constraints on available housing land.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 13:
Representation ID: 24698
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society
SPS considers that development should be concentrated within the town (Option 5) and an increase in density would be preferable to erosion of countryside edge locations or encroaching into adjoining districts. Failure to concentrate in large urban areas will mean more greenfield sites need to be released which will reduce the viability of regeneration of urban brownfield sites.
SPS considers that development should be concentrated within the town (Option 5) and an increase in density would be preferable to erosion of countryside edge locations or encroaching into adjoining districts. Failure to concentrate in large urban areas will mean more greenfield sites need to be released which will reduce the viability of regeneration of urban brownfield sites.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 15:
Representation ID: 24699
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society
To be truly sustainable SPS believes that jobs and homes should be proximate to minimise car journeys and safeguard the environment.
To be truly sustainable SPS believes that jobs and homes should be proximate to minimise car journeys and safeguard the environment.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 17:
Representation ID: 24700
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society
SPS would always seek to protect distinctive settlements and sensitive landscapes while recognising that in some instances sustainable locations should be brought forward in preference to encroaching into countryside.
SPS would always seek to protect distinctive settlements and sensitive landscapes while recognising that in some instances sustainable locations should be brought forward in preference to encroaching into countryside.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 18:
Representation ID: 24701
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society
SPS would always seek to protect distinctive settlements and sensitive landscapes while recognising that in some instances sustainable locations should be brought forward in preference to encroaching into countryside.
SPS would always seek to protect distinctive settlements and sensitive landscapes while recognising that in some instances sustainable locations should be brought forward in preference to encroaching into countryside.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 19:
Representation ID: 24702
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society
Small town centre employment sites which may represent a risk to residential amenity could be released for housing while accessible larger employment sites along the A14/A12 corridors should be protected. SPS believes that Baseline housing and economic growth which could allow surplus employment land to be released for housing.
Small town centre employment sites which may represent a risk to residential amenity could be released for housing while accessible larger employment sites along the A14/A12 corridors should be protected. SPS believes that Baseline housing and economic growth which could allow surplus employment land to be released for housing.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 20:
Representation ID: 24703
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society
SPS considers that open space in urban areas is valuable to well-being and residential amenity and should be protected.
SPS considers that open space in urban areas is valuable to well-being and residential amenity and should be protected.
