ipswich.gov.uk

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Search Representations

Results for Suffolk Preservation Society search

New search New search

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 2:

Representation ID: 24694

Received: 24/10/2017

Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society

Representation Summary:

A high quality historic environment rich in designated and non-designated heritage assets including listed buildings, conservation areas and parks and gardens. The Borough abuts the Suffolk Coasts and Heaths Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, a nationally designated landscape, and impacts of development on the setting of which should be accorded full weight in the development plan.

Full text:

A high quality historic environment rich in designated and non-designated heritage assets including listed buildings, conservation areas and parks and gardens. The Borough abuts the Suffolk Coasts and Heaths Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, a nationally designated landscape, and impacts of development on the setting of which should be accorded full weight in the development plan.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 3:

Representation ID: 24695

Received: 24/10/2017

Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society

Representation Summary:

A number of brownfield sites along Star Lane and Grafton Way which interrupt the connectivity between the historic core of the town and the Waterfront. Environmental improvements to these important streets would facilitate the regeneration of the town.

Full text:

A number of brownfield sites along Star Lane and Grafton Way which interrupt the connectivity between the historic core of the town and the Waterfront. Environmental improvements to these important streets would facilitate the regeneration of the town.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 4:

Representation ID: 24696

Received: 24/10/2017

Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society

Representation Summary:

Focus on the historic environment as a key driver for regeneration of the town's economy

Full text:

Focus on the historic environment as a key driver for regeneration of the town's economy

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 6:

Representation ID: 24697

Received: 24/10/2017

Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society

Representation Summary:

SPS believes that the Baseline, Scenario A should be planned for. We believe that to aim for greater economic growth would require a substantial increase in the level of housing that would be undeliverable given the identified constraints on available housing land.

Full text:

SPS believes that the Baseline, Scenario A should be planned for. We believe that to aim for greater economic growth would require a substantial increase in the level of housing that would be undeliverable given the identified constraints on available housing land.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 13:

Representation ID: 24698

Received: 24/10/2017

Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society

Representation Summary:

SPS considers that development should be concentrated within the town (Option 5) and an increase in density would be preferable to erosion of countryside edge locations or encroaching into adjoining districts. Failure to concentrate in large urban areas will mean more greenfield sites need to be released which will reduce the viability of regeneration of urban brownfield sites.

Full text:

SPS considers that development should be concentrated within the town (Option 5) and an increase in density would be preferable to erosion of countryside edge locations or encroaching into adjoining districts. Failure to concentrate in large urban areas will mean more greenfield sites need to be released which will reduce the viability of regeneration of urban brownfield sites.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 15:

Representation ID: 24699

Received: 24/10/2017

Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society

Representation Summary:

To be truly sustainable SPS believes that jobs and homes should be proximate to minimise car journeys and safeguard the environment.

Full text:

To be truly sustainable SPS believes that jobs and homes should be proximate to minimise car journeys and safeguard the environment.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 17:

Representation ID: 24700

Received: 24/10/2017

Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society

Representation Summary:

SPS would always seek to protect distinctive settlements and sensitive landscapes while recognising that in some instances sustainable locations should be brought forward in preference to encroaching into countryside.

Full text:

SPS would always seek to protect distinctive settlements and sensitive landscapes while recognising that in some instances sustainable locations should be brought forward in preference to encroaching into countryside.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 18:

Representation ID: 24701

Received: 24/10/2017

Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society

Representation Summary:

SPS would always seek to protect distinctive settlements and sensitive landscapes while recognising that in some instances sustainable locations should be brought forward in preference to encroaching into countryside.

Full text:

SPS would always seek to protect distinctive settlements and sensitive landscapes while recognising that in some instances sustainable locations should be brought forward in preference to encroaching into countryside.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 19:

Representation ID: 24702

Received: 24/10/2017

Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society

Representation Summary:

Small town centre employment sites which may represent a risk to residential amenity could be released for housing while accessible larger employment sites along the A14/A12 corridors should be protected. SPS believes that Baseline housing and economic growth which could allow surplus employment land to be released for housing.

Full text:

Small town centre employment sites which may represent a risk to residential amenity could be released for housing while accessible larger employment sites along the A14/A12 corridors should be protected. SPS believes that Baseline housing and economic growth which could allow surplus employment land to be released for housing.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 20:

Representation ID: 24703

Received: 24/10/2017

Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society

Representation Summary:

SPS considers that open space in urban areas is valuable to well-being and residential amenity and should be protected.

Full text:

SPS considers that open space in urban areas is valuable to well-being and residential amenity and should be protected.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.