Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Comment

Representation ID: 24922

Received: 29/10/2017

Respondent: Tuddenham St Martin Parish Council

The development restrictions on villages included in the category of 'Other Village' in the Settlement Hierarchy classification sterilises any improvement of the village and prevents any housing development.
Tuddenham St Martin Parish Council has strong objections to any potential plots identified which would add to the physical separation of villages from Ipswich and also have a negative impact on the highway infrastructure and limited school provision in the area.

Comment

Representation ID: 24923

Received: 29/10/2017

Respondent: Tuddenham St Martin Parish Council

The Parish Council considers Option 4 'Continuation of existing approach' the best solution.

Comment

Representation ID: 24924

Received: 29/10/2017

Respondent: Tuddenham St Martin Parish Council

The policy approach should continue to maintain the physical separation of villages from Ipswich. The source of housing land in infill gaps between settlements should not be considered and preference should be given to developing brownfield sites within Ipswich before developing areas outside the borough.

Comment

Representation ID: 24927

Received: 29/10/2017

Respondent: Tuddenham St Martin Parish Council

Improved public transport provision and transport links are required that meet the needs of the community and neighbouring communities. These include buses which tie in better with local school timetables and improvements in the travel service between neighbouring villages in order to reduce individual car journeys. Cycle provision should also be improved, particularly utilising bridleways and footpaths where appropriate to enable movement away from main roads.

Comment

Representation ID: 24928

Received: 29/10/2017

Respondent: Tuddenham St Martin Parish Council

Improved public transport provision and transport links are required that meet the needs of the community and neighbouring communities. These include buses which tie in better with local school timetables and improvements in the travel service between neighbouring villages in order to reduce individual car journeys. Cycle provision should also be improved, particularly utilising bridleways and footpaths where appropriate to enable movement away from main roads.