Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for AquiGen search
New searchComment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 28
Representation ID: 25106
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: AquiGen
The ability to robustly and credibly define a Retail Park as a 'Centre' does rely on the relationship of the Park with the NPPF definition of a Town Centre. NPPF requires a Plan to include strategic policies for the provision of inter alia retail development. This supports the introduction of specific policy recognition for a Retail Park and the formulation of positive policies to identify an opportunity to evolve, support a specific need and enhance provision across an area. In this context we recommend that Futura Park warrants identification as a strategic Retail Park site.
Furthermore, affording the opportunity for a de facto extension to the east of Nacton Road would enhance the complementary relationship which exist with Futura Park.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 67:
Representation ID: 25108
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: AquiGen
There are no immediately available opportunities to the south and west of
[Ravenswood] District Centre to support a viable extension. In the absence of this, affording the opportunity for a 'de facto' extension to the east of Nacton Road would have the particular benefit of enhancing the complementary relationship which already exists with Futura Park and promoting mutually beneficial linkage.
See attached.