Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Suffolk Constabulary search
New searchComment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 35:
Representation ID: 24849
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Constabulary
*Policy DM1: Sustainable development .
*Policy DM3: Provision of Private Outdoor Amenity Space in New and Existing Developments.
*Policy DM5: Design and Character
*Policy DM5 paragraph 9.46.
*Policy DM8: Heritage Assets and Conservation:
*Policy DM12: Extensions to Dwelling Houses and the Provision of Ancillary Buildings
*Policy DM14: The Subdivision of Family Dwellings.
*Policy DM17 Transport and Access in New Developments.
*Policy DM18: Car and Cycle Parking.
*Policies DM:20 - 23 Shopping centres .
*Policy DM29: Provision of New Open Spaces, Sport and Recreation Facilities.
*Policy DM32: Protection and Provision of Community Facilities.
See attached
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 41:
Representation ID: 24850
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Constabulary
A mix as this creates a better community with a variety of ages and backgrounds.
See attached
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 47:
Representation ID: 24851
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Constabulary
Yes. HMO's can put disproportionate pressure onto local neighbours, parking provision and noise, which can lead to conflict.
Maintaining a high quality of HMO's is essential to ensure the safety of the residents therein, as well as neighbouring properties. This should be reflected in policy DM14.
See attached
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 79:
Representation ID: 24852
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Constabulary
A balance between the principles of Secured By Design, sustainable development and good architectural design.
See attached
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 80:
Representation ID: 24853
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Constabulary
Suffolk Constabulary supports the objective of Building for Life 12 to create a development that is safe and provides everything expected for a new community.
See attached
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 84:
Representation ID: 24854
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Constabulary
Please refer to comments on DM8 above where greater emphasis is given to security in order to protect heritage assets as risk of damage through criminal behaviour. Also to ensure anyone living or working in such buildings is afforded the flexibility on security to ensure that inhabiting the building is viable, to prevent empty buildings which often then become a target for criminal and anti-social behaviour.
See attached
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 92:
Representation ID: 24855
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Constabulary
As previously described, this should be on the edge of housing areas - but close enough for young people to be safe and subject to some natural surveillance.
Young people in the area, as well as those working with them , should be consulted at the time of any proposals to ascertain which facilities are required by that community.
Design Out Crime Officers should also be consulted at the earliest opportunity.
See attached
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 100:
Representation ID: 24856
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Constabulary
Older people can be more vulnerable than other members of the community, therefore any purpose built accommodation must be built to SBD standards.
Design Out Crime Officer advice should be sought prior to planning purpose built accommodation to ensure that it is not located in known crime hotspots where a disproportionate level of distress may be caused to residents.
See attached
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 54:
Representation ID: 24857
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Constabulary
Provide more park and ride options (ie re-open Bury Rd, even if only for peak periods).
See attached
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 34:
Representation ID: 25499
Received: 24/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Constabulary
Yes. HMO's can put disproportionate pressure onto local neighbours, parking provision and noise, which can lead to conflict.
Maintaining a high quality of HMO's is essential to ensure the safety of the residents therein, as well as neighbouring properties. This should be reflected in policy DM14.
See attached