Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
Search representations
Results for Northern Fringe Protection Group search
New searchObject
Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
CS20
Representation ID: 25674
Received: 11/03/2019
Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group
This chapter and the wider CS need to be updated to take account of the decision to cancel TUOC.
It is not clear whether the traffic modelling assesses the impact of the potential construction of Sizewell C.
Some form of northern relief road is required in order to implement the CS in a sound and effective manner as evidenced in the WSP reports. Model runs 2 and 6 should be provided as part of the consultation process to assess the revised CS. Some Ipswich junctions that are over-capacity have been omitted from the main report.
8.220 needs amending to "will".
See Scanned Representation
Object
Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
DM3
Representation ID: 25681
Received: 11/03/2019
Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group
IBC is not doing enough to tackle the issue of air quality and must do more. Objective 11 of the current Local Plan should not be removed. The additional congestion from traffic modelling will worsen air quality and this is illegal and therefore would render the CS unsound.
The CS needs to comply with paragraph 181 of the NPPF and make a clear commitment to improving air quality in Ipswich and the compliance with legally binding air pollution targets.
Concerns and questions raised in relation to the Air Quality Topic Paper, AQMA and rail assessment.
See Scanned Representation
Object
Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
DM20
Representation ID: 25683
Received: 11/03/2019
Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group
It remains unclear how 'severe' and 'significant' adverse impacts are defined. These need to be clearly defined in the CS. In the case of air quality, there are maximum legal limits for particulates and nitrous oxides, and it would be appropriate for 'significant' to be defined as the legal limit.
See Scanned Representation
Object
Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
DM3
Representation ID: 26142
Received: 11/03/2019
Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group
IBC is already in breach of guidelines and requirements when assessing the impacts of development on air quality and needs to alter its practices to comply with the Core Strategy.
See scanned representation