Preferred Options Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review

Object

Representation ID: 26089

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Highways: Site is likely to have a significant on junction already under strain and junction (capacity) enhancement may be necessary to avoid cumulative residual severe impact.

Object

Representation ID: 26090

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Highways:
- Potential foot/cycle bridge landing near former flood gate represents opportunity to improve sustainable access.
- Site is likely to have a significant on junction already under strain and junction (capacity) enhancement may be necessary to avoid cumulative residual severe impact.

Object

Representation ID: 26091

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Highways:
- Contrary to town centre first policy for offices.
- Site IP152 needs access most likely through a junction to the A1189 through this site.
- It does not appear that safe and sustainable access and be made to the site.
- Left-in left-out access through IP150b required to mitigate impact
- Foot way along perimeter track represents opportunity for sustainable access improvement.
- Site is likely to have a significant impact on junctions already under strain and junction (capacity) enhancements could be necessary to avoid cumulative residual severe impact.

Object

Representation ID: 26092

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Highways:
- Does not appear that safe and sustainable access can be made to the site.
- To mitigate this it would need to access through IP150a and b.
- Diverting FP1 to crossing on Nacton Road represents a sustainable access improvement opportunity.
- The site is likely to have a significant impact on junctions already under strain and junction (capacity) enhancements could be necessary to avoid cumulative residual severe impact.

Object

Representation ID: 26093

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Highways:
- It does not appear that safe and sustainable access can be made to the site
- Land required for junction vehicular capacity and pedestrian and cyclist improvements as a likely mitigation measure.
- Toucan facilities represent an opportunity to improve sustainable access.
- The site is likely to affect a location with a significant number of recorded accidents (Bury Road/ Old Norwich Road).
- The site is likely to have a significant impact on junctions already under strain and junction (capacity) enhancements are not likely to be necessary to avoid cumulative residual severe impact.

Object

Representation ID: 26094

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Highways:
- It does not appear that safe and sustainable access can be made to the site.
- Access through IP150a or via perimeter track following major scheme for sites 150c, 152d and 152.
- Provision of footway along perimeter track is an opportunity to improve sustainable access.
- Site is likely to have a significant impact on junctions which are already under strain and junction (capacity) enhancements could be necessary to avoid cumulative residual severe impact.

Object

Representation ID: 26095

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Highways:
- Public Rights of Way dedication represents opportunity to improve sustainable access.

Object

Representation ID: 26096

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Highways:
- In relation to the two park and ride sites (Anglia Parkway & IP152) it should be noted that Suffolk County Council are not proposing to fund these services.

Object

Representation ID: 26149

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Desk-based assessment has been undertaken for this site.

Object

Representation ID: 26150

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Add from this from the SPD: "Design questions would relate to the surviving defences and structures in particular, which were largely left in situ in earlier excavations". Please also note that archaeology could be a major consideration rather than would be?