Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Main Modifications
Appendix 1: Amendments to Table 8.1 (MM9)
Table 8.1 - Objectively Assessed Housing Need across the Ipswich Housing Market Area based on the standard method
SHMA annual |
SHMA total (2014-2036) |
Standard method annual (Sept 2017) |
Standard method total (2016 - 2036) |
Standard method annual (2016-based) |
Standard method total (2016-based) (2018-2036) |
Standard method annual (2014-based) |
Standard method total (2014-based) (2018-2036) |
Standard method annual (2014 based, 2018 ratios) |
Standard method total (2014 based, 2018 ratios, 2018 - 36) |
Standard method annual (2014 based, 2019 ratios) |
Standard method total (2014 based, 2019 ratios, 2018 - 36) |
|
Babergh |
355 |
7,820 |
439 |
8,780 |
420 |
7,560 |
420 |
7,560 |
420 |
7,560 |
416 |
7,488 |
Ipswich |
519 |
11,420 |
442 |
8,840 |
479 |
8,622 |
445 |
8,010 |
445 |
8,010 |
460 |
8,280 |
Mid Suffolk |
452 |
9,951 |
573 |
11,460 |
590 |
10,620 |
585 |
10,530 |
556 |
10,008 |
535 |
|
Suffolk Coastal |
460 |
10,111 |
495 |
9,900 |
582 |
10,476 |
515 |
9,270 |
542 |
9,756 |
489[2] |
8,802 |
Total |
1,786 |
39,302 |
1,949 |
38,980 |
2,071 |
37,278 |
1,965 |
35,370 |
1,963 |
35,334 |
1,900 |
34,200 |
Note: the Babergh figure of 420 p.a. includes the application of a cap on the uplift, as allowed for by the methodology.
Appendix 2: Amendments to Table 3 (MM35)
TABLE 3 HOUSING LAND SUPPLY AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENT AT 1st APRIL 20202019
Number of dwellings |
Discounted Numbers |
Cumulative Numbers |
||
1 |
Completions 1st April 2018 to 31st March |
644 |
- |
644 |
2 |
Dwellings under construction |
449 |
- |
1,093 |
3 |
Dwellings with planning permission (including 1,915 dwellings at Ipswich Garden Suburb) |
2,846 |
|
|
4 |
Dwellings with a resolution to grant planning permission (subject to the prior completion of a Section 106 agreement) |
217 |
|
|
5 |
Number of dwellings required on new site allocations and on windfall sites to 2036 |
4,431 |
|
TABLE NOTES
The discounted numbers in the table allow 10% slippage for planning permissions that may not be implemented.
Line 2: Dwellings under construction at 31st March 20202019 - assumed that all will be completed over the plan period.
Line 3: Other dwellings with planning permission at 31stMarch 20192020 - assumed that 10% of these will not be completed.
Line 4: Dwellings with a resolution to grant planningpermission from the Council's Planning and Development Committee but which are awaiting completion of a Section 106 Agreement before planning permission is issued, at 31st March 20192020- assumed that 10% of these will not be completed.
Line 5: To reach the minimum requirement of 8,0108,280 dwellings by 2036, together with windfall sites, further land will need to be allocatedwithin the Borough for at least 6,1004,431 new homes.
Appendix 3: New Diagram: Housing Trajectory (MM39)
New Diagram Ipswich housing trajectory at 1st April 2020
Housing Trajectory 1st April 2020
Completions since 2018 and projections to 2036
[The figures in this housing trajectory schedule have been updated post submission to reflect the evidence provided in Core Documents K18 and K19 and the comments in the Inspectors' post hearing letter (K28)]
Appendix 4: Amendments to Table 4 (MM40)
TABLE 4 ESTIMATED HOUSING DELIVERY FOR 2019 2020-2036 EXCLUDING CURRENT PERMISSIONS AS AT 1 ST APRIL 2019 2020
Area of Ipswich |
%age (dwellings) Previously developed land |
Total Additional dwellings
|
IP-One |
100% |
|
Rest of built up area |
|
|
Ipswich Garden Suburb (see policy CS10) (A further 1,915 dwellings at IGS have outline planning permission) |
0% |
|
Northern end of Humber Doucy Lane (see Policy ISPA4) |
0% |
|
Total |
|
|
Windfall sites |
90% |
|
Total |
|
|
Appendix 5: New Appendix: Housing Trajectory (MM159)
Please see PDF for New Appendix 9 Ipswich Housing Trajectory at 1st April 2020
Appendix 6 – Amendments to Table 8A (MM137)
TABLE 8A Major Infrastructure Proposals
Proposal |
What aspect of thestrategy depends on theproposal |
Lead Delivery Body / Bodies |
Approx. Cost |
Potential developer contribution (S106) |
Potential funding gap |
Potential funding sources |
Time-scale |
Flood Management |
|||||||
Ipswich Flood Defence Management Strategy May include measures such as sheet piling renewal or a pumping station - to be confirmed by Environment Agency |
Continued regeneration through mixed use developments within the Flood Risk zones in IP-One |
Environment Agency |
To be confirmed when the measures have been identified |
tbc |
tbc |
Defra Environment Agency Developer contributions |
2036 |
Early years |
|||||||
Additional early years capacity to meet demand arising from development in Alexandra Ward New setting at IP048
|
Essential to support growth |
Suffolk County Council |
£2,350,448
£1,609,812 - £1,902,267 |
£2,176,821
£1,609,812 - £1,902,267 |
£173,627.00 |
Developer contributions |
Through-out plan period |
New early years setting at ISPA4.1 (Humber Doucy Lane) - to be determined at Masterplanning stage |
Essential to growth |
Suffolk County Council |
£958,980 |
£915,477.12 (IBC only, does not include contributions from East Suffolk Council) |
£43,502.88 |
Developer Contributions |
2031 onwards based on delivery of site ISPA4.1 in the housing trajectory. |
Additional early years capacity to meet demand arising from development in Bridge Ward New setting at Halifax Primary School (preferred option if funding gap can be addressed) or Expansion of provision at Hillside Primary School |
Essential to support growth |
Suffolk County Council |
£588,330 or £414,900 |
£493,381 or £414,900 |
£94,949 or £0 |
Suffolk County Council Developer contributions |
Through-out plan period |
Additional early years capacity to meet demand arising from development in Castle Hill, Whitehouse and Whitton Wards If possible, expand provision at Highfield Nursery |
Essential to support growth |
Suffolk County Council |
£597,456 - £705,996 |
£597,456 - £705,996 |
£0 |
Suffolk County Council Developer contributions |
Through-out plan period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional early years capacity to meet demand arising from development in Gipping Ward New setting on development site |
Essential to support growth |
Suffolk County Council |
£1,175,224
|
£1,612,136
|
£0
|
Suffolk County Council Developer contributions |
Through-out plan period |
Additional early years capacity to meet demand arising from development in Holywells Ward New 60 place setting at Rosehill Primary School New 90 place setting at IP037 subject to sequential and exception test |
Essential to support growth |
Suffolk County Council |
£2,431,764
|
£2,431,764
|
£0
|
Suffolk County Council Developer contributions |
Through-out plan period |
|
|
|
£331,920 Or £588,330 |
£331,920 Or £392,220 |
|
Developer contributions |
|
Primary education |
|||||||
Primary School Provision New school at IP048a Mint Quarter Extensions to existing schools:
|
Essential for the delivery of residential development across Ipswich including at the Waterfront |
Suffolk County Council / Dept. for Education |
£8,236,620 £3,100,000
£1,742,580 - £3,485,160 £1,200,000 |
£3,824,145 (based on 195 pupils) £ 1,211,423
£4,513,952 £3,065,537 |
£4,415,175 £1,888,577
£0 £0 |
Suffolk County Council Dept. for Education Developer Contributions |
Through-out plan period |
Secondary education |
|||||||
Secondary School expansion
Stoke High School |
Essential for the delivery of residential development across Ipswich including at the Waterfront and in Babergh Mid Suffolk District(s) |
Suffolk County Council |
£4,320,220 |
£5,148,729
|
£0
|
Suffolk County Council Dept. for Education Developer Contributions from Babergh Mid Suffolk and Ipswich |
Through-out plan period |
Special Education Needs and Disability |
|||||||
IP129 - Woodbridge Road - SEND School |
Essential to support growth |
Suffolk County Council |
Fully Funded by Dept. For Education |
£0 |
£0 |
Dept. for Education |
Through-out plan period |
Post-16 education |
|||||||
Expansion of |
Essential to support growth |
Suffolk County Council |
|
£7,799,134 |
£0 |
Suffolk County Council Dept. for Education Developer contributions including from neighbouring authorities |
Through-out plan period |
Waste provision |
|||||||
Relocation of Portman's Walk Household Waste Recycling Centre (HWRC) Expansion of Foxhall HWRC |
Essential to support growth |
Suffolk County Council |
£3m £6m |
£110 per dwelling
|
£0 |
Suffolk County Council Developer contributions |
Through-out plan period |
Libraries |
|||||||
Expansion of existing libraries, remodelling of existing libraries or provision of flexible, digital access and/or mobile services. Strategy and distribution of improvements to be developed during the plan period |
Essential to support growth |
Suffolk County Council |
£700,000[4] |
£216 per dwelling |
£0 |
Suffolk County Council Developer contributions |
Through-out plan period |
Transport |
|||||||
A14 Junction improvements Junction 55 Copdock Junction 56 Wherstead Junction 57 Nacton Junction 58 Seven Hills |
Essential to support ISPA-wide growth |
Suffolk County Council Highways England |
£65m-£100m £5m-£10m £5m-£10m £5m |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Developer contributions (S278/S106) from all the ISPA authorities Highways England (RIS or Minor Works Fund) Central Government |
Through-out plan period |
Measures to increase capacity on A1214 |
Essential to support ISPA-wide growth |
Suffolk County Council Highways England |
£4m |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Developer contributions from all the ISPA authorities |
Through-out plan period |
Sustainable transport measures in Ipswich, including Smarter Choices, Quality Bus Partnership and other measures as identified in ISPA Transport Mitigation Strategy and other relevant emerging strategies. |
Essential to support ISPA-wide growth |
Suffolk County Council |
£7.3m-£8.4m to 2026 |
Tbc based on funding strategy |
Tbc based on funding strategy |
Developer contributions from all the ISPA authorities Suffolk County Council ISPA authorities |
Through-out plan period |
Infrastructure improvements to support sustainable transport measures and junction improvements |
Essential to support ISPA-wide growth |
Suffolk County Council |
£16m-£20m to 2026 |
Tbc through action plan |
Tbc through action plan |
Developer contributions from all the ISPA authorities Suffolk County Council ISPA authorities |
Through-out plan period |
Link road through site IP029 via Europa Way from Bramford Road to Sproughton Road) |
Desirable but not essential to support planned growth |
Suffolk County Council |
|
|
|
Suffolk County Council New Anglia LEP
|
Anticipated Start of February 2021 |
Wet Dock Crossing |
Desirable but not essential to support planned growth |
Suffolk County Council |
Tbc |
tbc |
SCC has agreed up to £10.8m and funding gap will be difference between this and total cost. |
Suffolk County Council Developer contributions |
Through-out plan period |
Green infrastructure |
|||||||
Green infrastructure: - green trail around Ipswich - country park at Ipswich Garden Suburb (see Table 8B) Expansion of Orwell Country Park |
Essential to support growth |
Developers Suffolk County Council Ipswich Borough Council |
IGS Country Park - £4,225,000 (excluding maintenance and SuDS) |
IGS Country Park - £0 (Provided by Housing Infrastructure Fund) |
IGS Country Park - £0 |
Developer contributions and direct provision Housing Infrastructure Fund Ipswich Borough Council Recreational Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy contributions (Orwell Country Park) |
Through-out plan period |
Utilities |
|||||||
New primary substation at Turret Lane |
Development in the town centre in support of urban regeneration |
UK Power Networks |
tbc |
Tbc |
tbc |
UK Power Networks |
Need and delivery still under investigation |
Water supply - site connections to the existing network (may include network upgrades) Foul sewerage network - site connections to the existing network (may include network upgrades) |
Essential to support growth |
Anglian Water Services Ltd |
tbc |
tbc |
tbc |
Anglian Water Developer contributions |
Throughout plan period |
Sport & leisure facilities |
|||||||
New sports, leisure and recreation facilities - will be identified through IBC review of sports provision
Rights of Way Improvement Plan Ravenswood Sports Park IP150b Relocation of King George V Playing Fields IP032 |
Supporting growth, enhancing health and quality of life, and supporting greener lifestyles and green transport |
Ipswich Borough Council Developers Highway Authority for Rights of Way Improvement Plan |
tbc |
tbc |
tbc |
Developer contributions Ipswich Borough Council Housing Infrastructure Fund Suffolk County Council |
Need and delivery still under investigation |
Healthcare provision |
|||||||
Health centre at IP005 Former Tooks Bakery Healthcare provision enhancements - to be identified in conjunction with schemes coming forward |
Essential to support growth |
Ipswich & East Suffolk Clinical Commissioning Group East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust |
tbc |
tbc |
tbc |
Dept. for Health NHS England East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust Ipswich & East Suffolk Clinical Commissioning Group Developer contributions |
Through-out plan period |
Appendix 8 - The Ipswich Ecological Network updates to reflect the findings of the Ipswich Wildlife Audit (2019) (MM161)
The existing ecological network has been updated as follows to reflect the findings of the Ipswich Wildlife Audit 2019. The list below explains how this has changed.
Site added to Potential Development site with wildlife interest Rank 1 - 4
- IP035 Burtons Site, Key Street / Star Lane
- IP067a Former British Energy Site (north) - (not previously assessed)
- IP067b Former British Energy Site (south) - (not previously assessed)
- IP109 Jupiter Road/Reading Road
- IP141a(1) Land at Futura Park, Nacton Road (fronting Nacton Road)
- IP150a Areas U, V & W, south of Ravenswood
- IP184b Land opposite 367 to 383 Humber Doucy Lane (previously part of a wider site IP184 and not a potential development site)
- IP184c (part of ISPA4 allocation) Land opposite 341 to 365 Humber Doucy Lane (previously part of a wider site IP184 and not a potential development site)
- IP221 The Flying Horse PH, 4 Waterford Road
- IP302 Land opposite 193-251 Humber Doucy Lane
- IP309 68A Austin Street
- IP350 (part of ISPA4 allocation) West corner of Humber Doucy Lane/Tuddenham Road
Site added to Potential Development site with wildlife interest Rank 5 or below
- IP011a Lower Orwell Street (formerly Smart Street/ Foundation Street)
- IP011b Smart Street / Foundation Street
- IP012 Peter's Ice Cream
- IP014 Hope Church
- IP015 West End Road Surface car park
- IP028a Island site adjacent to Jewsons, Greyfriars Road
- IP028b Jewsons, Greyfriars Road
- IP030a Humber Doucy Lane (opposite 97 to 123)
- IP030b Humber Doucy Lane (opposite 37 to 97)
- IP031(a & b) Burrell Road
- IP037 The Island Site
- IP039a Land between Gower Street & Great Whip Street
- IP040 Civic Centre Area / Civic Drive
- IP041 Former Police Station, Civic Drive
- IP042 Land between Cliff Quay and Landseer Road
- IP043 Commercial Buildings and Jewish Burial Ground, Star Lane
- IP045 Holywells Road East
- IP047 Commercial Road
- IP048a Mint Quarter / Cox Lane East
- IP048b Cox Lane West Regeneration Area
- IP054b Land between Old Cattle Market and Star Lane
- IP064a Land between Holywells Road and Holywells Park
- IP074 Church and land at Upper Orwell Street
- IP080 240 Wherstead Road
- IP089 Waterworks Street
- IP096 Car Park Handford Road
- IP098 Transco south of Patteson Road
- IP105 Depot, Beaconsfield Road
- IP119 Land east of West End Road
- IP120b Land west of West End Road
- IP131 Milton Street
- IP133 Land south of Felaw Street
- IP135 112-116 Bramford Road
- IP142 Land at Duke Street
- IP184a (part of ISPA4 allocation) Land opposite 383 to 447 Humber Doucy Lane (previously part of a wider site IP184 and not a potential development site)
- IP188 Webster's Saleyard Site, Dock Street
- IP200 Griffin Wharf, Bath Street
- IP279 Former British Telecom Office, Bibb Way
- IP280 Westerfield House, Humber Doucy Lane
- IP283 Grimwade Street, Student Union Club and adjacent car park, Rope Walk
- IP303 (part of ISPA4 Allocation) East corner Humber Doucy Lane/Tuddenham Road
- IP307 Prince of Wales Drive
- IP344 (part of ISPA4 Allocation) Land north of 447 and fronting Humber Doucy Lane
- IP346 Suffolk Retail Park
- IP356 79 Hutland Road/Sidegate Lane
Potential development site updated from 2012 Wildlife Audit report
- IP003 Waste tip and employment area north of Sir Alf Ramsey Way - site boundary amended, rank unchanged
- IP010 Felixstowe Road - site split to form IP010a and IP010b, rank unchanged
- IP029 Land Opposite 674-734 Bramford Road - rank updated to 3+ Medium (was 4 Medium)
- IP061 School Site, Lavenham Road - site boundary amended, rank unchanged
- IP066 JJ Wilson, White Elm Street - site boundary extended, rank updated 6 Low (was 5 Low)
- IP143 Former Norsk Hydro site, Sandy Lane - potential development area of site boundary amended, rank updated to 4 Medium (was 3 Medium)
- IP150b Land south of Ravenswood west (Sports Park) - site divided to form a revised IP150b and new IP150d, rank updated to 3+ Medium (was 3 Medium)
- IP150c - Land south of Ravenswood east (fronting Nacton Road) - site divided to form a revised IP150c and new site IP150e, rank updated to 3+ Medium (was 3 Medium)
Site developed - incorporating wildlife buffer
- IP005 Former Tooks Bakery, Old Norwich Road
- IP090 (part) Europa Way (area of new care home removed)
- IP116a & b Former St Clement's Hospital Grounds
- IP141a(3) Land at Futura Park, Nacton Road (employment site behind Waitrose) - this area was surveyed for the Wildlife Audit update in 2019 but has since been developed
- IP146 (part) Ransomes Europark (developed areas at Lytham Road and Berwick Road removed)
- IP165 Eastway Business Park, Europa Way
- UC264 (site 151) Land between railway junction and Hadleigh Road
- W62 (site 87) Rear of 346 Felixstowe Road (Garrods Pond)
Explanation of Site Rankings Taken From the 2019 SWT Wildlife Audit[5]
Site Ranking 1 (High Conservation Value): Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs): the most important sites for wildlife within a national context. The criteria used to assess such sites have been developed by English Nature (now Natural England).
Site Ranking 2 (High Conservation Values): County Wildlife Sites (CWSs): these sites have a high priority for protection. Although there is currently no statutory protection, all of Suffolk's local authorities have included a policy in their local plans to protect CWSs from development. The criteria used to assess CWSs have been developed by Suffolk Wildlife Trust, Suffolk County Council, Natural England and Suffolk Biological Records Centre (SBRC) (The County Wildlife Site panel). The information is available on the Suffolk Biodiversity Information Service (SBIS) website: http://www.suffolkbis.org.uk/suffolk-sites/cws.
Site Ranking 3 (Medium Conservation Value): Sites which do not fulfil the criteria for SSSI or CWS status but have a high conservation value: In some districts, these are designated as 'Local Wildlife Sites' when they are situated within urban areas. These sites comprise the best examples of different habitats or are important for a particular species and are assessed of the following criteria:
- Non-recreatability;
- Diversity and presence of indicator species;
- Rarity;
- Potential value;
- Size;
- Woodland;
- Scrub;
- Grassland;
- Created habitats; and
- Species.
Site Ranking 4 (Medium Conservation Value): Other Sites of Nature Conservation Interest: sites which are less important for wildlife but still retain a degree of naturalness. Locally common Priority species such as song thrush may be present and also locally common protected species such as reptiles.
Site Ranking 5 (Low Conservation Value): Areas that have limited value for wildlife: These may include arable fields or regularly mown amenity grassland with some features of wildlife value, such as some boundary hedgerows or rough grass margins. In a highly built up area this could also include individual mature trees.
Site Ranking 6 (Low Conservation Value): Areas that have no or very limited value for wildlife: These may include built areas, large arable fields, other disturbed ground or regularly mown amenity grassland with no other semi-natural features.
[2] Following the creation of East Suffolk Council to replace the former Suffolk Coastal and Waveney District Councils from 1st April 2019, the affordability ratios for 2019
(published in March 2020) are at the East Suffolk level. The East Suffolk affordability ratio is therefore used in this calculation.
[3] It is not currently considered necessary to establish a new Sixth Form to serve Ipswich, but this will be reconsidered through the next plan review. If further capacity were required, the establishment of a new Sixth Form serving one or both of Ormiston Endeavour and the new Ipswich Garden Suburb secondary could be considered along with other options
[4] Approximately based on the number of dwellings from policy ISPA4 and SP2 housing allocations.
[5] See Section 3.2 of the Ipswich Wildlife Audit 2019 (CDL Ref. D21).