Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24212
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Planware Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Representation Summary:
The requirement to demonstrate a facility is genuinely redundant is too vague. The 12 month marketing requirement is too long, 6 weeks would be more appropriate for a public house. No consideration has been given to the negative impact on the community, employment provision or sustainability through sites remaining redundant for 12 months. The policy is not consistent with the policy in the NPPF which states that planning should not act as an impediment to sustainable growth.
Full text:
See attachment