ipswich.gov.uk
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 24687
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: RSPB
Agent: RSPB
The RSPB fully supports a co-ordinated, planned approach to the implementation of SuDS.
SuDS need to be incorporated at the earliest stage of the planning process, be on or near the land surface and delivered in broad partnership to the satisfaction of the end user (residents).
Their effectiveness should also be monitored.
In conjunction with the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust (WWT), we have produced a report on this subject (Graham/Day/Bray/Mackenzie - Sustainable Drainage Systems - Maximising the potential for people and wildlife: A guide for local authorities and developers).
The RSPB welcomes the Council setting out such a clear commitment to Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS), to which we are strong advocates.
In conjunction with the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust (WWT), we have produced a report on this subject (Graham/Day/Bray/Mackenzie - Sustainable Drainage Systems - Maximising the potential for people and wildlife: A guide for local authorities and developers).
A report produced by Environmental Policy Consulting in January 2017 for the Welsh Government, highlights the following advantages of SuDS:
a. SuDS need to be planned at the earliest stage of the planning process and integrated with general landscape design and maintenance;
b. SuDS on or near the land surface are far more cost-effective than below-ground proprietary systems;
c. Working in the broadest possible partnership offers the greatest potential to maximise benefits and lever additional funding; and
d. The significant role of 'champions' in obtaining 'buy-in', managing relationships using voluntary agreements, and in promoting successful delivery and continuing functioning of SuDS.