ipswich.gov.uk

Comment

Representation ID: 25223

Received: 27/11/2017

Respondent: Bloor Homes

In respect of Option 1, we would question whether a higher density urban-regeneration approach could deliver development needs in full. In addition, it is not clear if higher density urban regeneration is viable.

We would caution against relying on Option 2. The creation of a new settlement would require provision of entirely new infrastructure, and the cooperation and effective working of multiple agencies. Inevitably, there will be long lead in times for the commencement and completion of development.

The use of edge of settlement countryside represents a potentially sustainable Option 3. Such areas have the potential to be well-related to existing services, facilities, transport infrastructure and employment opportunities.

Option 4 directing growth east of Ipswich represents a sustainable approach.

Option 5 will reinforce the links across the administrative boundaries of Ipswich and Suffolk Coastal as well as supporting the County Town of Suffolk through increased focus of future growth.

We question the sustainability of option 6.