ipswich.gov.uk

Object

Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document

Representation ID: 5228

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

This is a very sensitive site. It contains a Grade II building on College Street, adjoins the listed and scheduled Wolsey Gate and is located between two conservation areas and two Grade II* churches. In terms of archaeology, there are two scheduled monuments to the north while the site itself was the location of a priory&college.

The wording of the site sheet is not effective with regards to archaeological considerations. The sheet should also be strengthened with regards to its wording on the conservation areas and listed buildings, and better linked to national policy wording.

Full text:

This is a very sensitive site, where much care will need to be taken to avoid harming the historic environment. It forms part of the transition area from the town centre to the waterfront, where development needs to reflect this transition in terms of design, scale etc. The site contains a Grade II listed building on College Street, adjoins the Grade I listed and scheduled Wolsey Gate (currently on the Heritage at Risk register) and is located between two conservation areas (Central and Wet Dock) and two Grade II* churches (St Peter's and St Mary at the Quay - the latter is on the Heritage at Risk Register). In terms of archaeology, there are two scheduled monuments to the north (part of the Saxon town) while the site itself was the location of the Priory of St Peter and St Paul and the Cardinal's College. The above heritage assets greatly influence the redevelopment of the site. We note that the Sustainability Appraisal identifies potential negative effects from this site on the historic environment (Objective ET9).

Although the revised site sheet now refers to many of the above heritage assets, the wording is not effective with regards to archaeological considerations. The extent of archaeological potential within this site and the wider area is not fully understood and the site sheet incorrectly suggests that there would be no objection in principle to development outside of the scheduled areas. There could be nationally important archaeology within the site where development may be constrained. The revised site sheet should also be strengthened with regards to its wording on the conservation areas and listed buildings, and better linked to national policy wording.

As currently drafted, we consider the plan to be unsound in terms of its effectiveness, deliverability and consistency with national policy. Paragraph 157 of the National Planning Policy Framework requires Local Plans to provide detail with site allocations where appropriate (fifth bullet point), with the Planning Practice Guidance stating "where sites are proposed for allocation, sufficient detail should be given to provide clarity to developers, local communities and other interests about the nature and scale of development (addressing the 'what, where, when and how' questions)" (PPG Reference ID: 12-010-20140306 (last revised 06/03/2014). Conservation of the historic environment is a core planning principle (Paragraph 17) and Local Plans should set out a positive strategy in this respect (Paragraph 126).