CS17: Delivering Infrastructure
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5882
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Roy Bush
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5885
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr James Collins
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5890
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: T Holden
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5895
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: F A Leeder
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5902
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: A W Parkin
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5911
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr R Snook
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5920
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs A Snook
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5930
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: D Roberts
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5938
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: River Action Group
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, it is not known whether the plan will improve matters.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5941
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Robert and Rosemary Free
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5950
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Robert and Rosemary Free
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5960
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Jill Page
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5973
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Frank Seal
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15010
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Michael Keats
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15027
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Cantwell
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15036
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Anne Saggers
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15039
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr John Stammers
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15051
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs H E Hawker
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15061
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Richard N Cater
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15069
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr John Howarth
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15080
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs D Jarman
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15090
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: D Thorn
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15111
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Roberta Seal
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15123
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Dennis Hussey
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15132
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Brown
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15141
Received: 02/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Sarah Marsden
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15148
Received: 02/03/2015
Respondent: Mr R M Coulter
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. The plan will not be effective and is unsound. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified. There is a lack of sewage pipeline capacity between the Garden Suburb and Cliff Quay treatment works.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15164
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Richard Young
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15176
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Carole Young
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 15188
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Glynne Whitehead
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.
See attached.