ipswich.gov.uk

CS17: Delivering Infrastructure

Showing comments and forms 91 to 120 of 1053

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15560

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Ms Glenys Bassett

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15572

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Susan Reed

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15584

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Andrew Reed

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15596

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Monger

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15608

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Jeffrey N Dunn

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15620

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Godfrey R Hill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15632

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Mary C Hill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15644

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Patricia Ball

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15656

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Malcolm John Woolnough

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15668

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Peter Shepherd

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15680

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Ernest G Thomas

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15692

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Judith Stephenson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15704

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Alfred Wheeler

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15716

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Janet Graham

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15728

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Dr Jean Wheeler

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15740

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Peter Kent

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15752

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Richard F Yapp

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15764

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Richard Matthews

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15776

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Susan Matthews

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15788

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Terence Hagan

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15800

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Patricia Hagan

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Traffic congestion is a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they and other infrastructure and services e.g. drainage cope with growth?
Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation can be implemented. Fresh/waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15806

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Terence and Linda Chambers

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15816

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Colin Girling

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15826

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs G M Girling

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15836

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Diane Penman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15846

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Michael Penman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15856

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Mary Hunt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15866

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr D Smithe

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15876

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Terence and Linda Chambers

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15886

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Cooper

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, development will not improve matters.

Full text:

See attached.