Object

Representation ID: 16207

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs P Bathgate

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16217

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: N/a Cole

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16227

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Peter Turtill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16237

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: P E Dadson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16247

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Kavandeer Aujla

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16257

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Sonia Allison

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16267

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Carol Webber

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16277

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: B M Webber

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16287

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Richard Bainbridge

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16297

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Karen Bainbridge

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16307

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Day

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16317

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Day

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16327

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Eddie V Manning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16337

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: L D Bones

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16347

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs L Wilding

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16357

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs M Conder

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16367

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr J Pawsey

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16377

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Rebecca Grant

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16387

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Elaine Waller

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16397

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Williams

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16407

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Williams

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16417

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs & Mrs Jane and John Rosher

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16427

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs & Mrs Jane and John Rosher

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16437

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs L A Zagni

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16447

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Brenda Pledger

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16457

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Geisel

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16467

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Geisel

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16477

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Aubrey Cook

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16487

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Maureen Todd

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16497

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Cannell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.