ipswich.gov.uk

Question 15:

Showing comments and forms 1 to 6 of 6

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 24681

Received: 18/10/2017

Respondent: Mr Chris Wheeler

Representation Summary:

A mixed approach is needed, but strategically the aim should be to limit the need for travel to work, and certainly not extended travel (e.g. to London). The effect of London economic growth on the South East has been to encourage more travel to London, leading to overcrowded trains, overpriced houses and worn out commuters. It's a failed strategy.

Full text:

A mixed approach is needed, but strategically the aim should be to limit the need for travel to work, and certainly not extended travel (e.g. to London). The effect of London economic growth on the South East has been to encourage more travel to London, leading to overcrowded trains, overpriced houses and worn out commuters. It's a failed strategy.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 24699

Received: 24/10/2017

Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society

Representation Summary:

To be truly sustainable SPS believes that jobs and homes should be proximate to minimise car journeys and safeguard the environment.

Full text:

To be truly sustainable SPS believes that jobs and homes should be proximate to minimise car journeys and safeguard the environment.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 24776

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Mr Andrew Hunter

Representation Summary:

Spatial distributions of jobs should align with housing development.

Full text:

Spatial distributions of jobs should align with housing development.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 24790

Received: 23/09/2017

Respondent: Mr Philip Pethybridge

Representation Summary:

The question presumes individuals in future are employed and working at workplaces. The number of self-employed has rocketed and growth in start-ups is huge. How about a growth area where there is housing and enterprise space e.g. small/medium sized and shared office/workshop space. To minimise commutes, put space in clusters, not massive industrial estates, but e.g. on Ravenswood an enterprise small business space where they can base themselves rather than driving into the town centre - facilities like Basepoint built closer to people's homes. There is nowhere in Ipswich I could relocate my business to (currently in Bury St Edmunds).

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 24967

Received: 25/10/2017

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Representation Summary:

Regardless of the approach taken, improving accessibility between homes and work places must be a priority when developing the Local Plans and assessing infrastructure requirements. A full cross-boundary Transport Assessment of the impact of draft Local Plans is required before they can be finalised.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 25062

Received: 31/10/2017

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Representation Summary:

Regardless of the approach taken, improving accessibility between homes and work places must be a priority when developing the Local Plans and assessing infrastructure requirements. A full cross-boundary Transport Assessment of the impact of draft Local Plans is required before they can be finalised.

Full text:

See attached.